From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Tue, 29 Feb 2000 12:55:41 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Sierra Army Depot - DTSC letter |
In response to my February 28 posting on the interstate implications of open burning and open detonation at the Sierra Army Depot, I have received some public documents originally from the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). In general, the documents suggest that the state is requiring risk assessments based upon conservative assumptions and a one in 100,000 cumulative cancer risk (10^-5). Of particular interest is a letter responding to the findings of Lassen County businessman, Jack Pastor, which I mentioned in my earlier message. I reproduce the text of the entire letter below, but one of the key arguments is buried in the following sentence: "Since induced cancer has approximately a 20 year latency period, any reports of cancers which were detected between 1994 through the present (that are not in the possession of DHS) in all likelihood can not be related to the current operations at the facility, which began treating large quantities of explosives and propellants only in the past few years." The letter also reports that California does exchange health data with Nevada, though it is possible that recent data has not been analyzed. Lenny Siegel TO: Jeff Van Slooten (Facility Permitting Branch, DTSC) FROM: Stephen Di Zio, PhD. (Senior Toxicologist) SUBJECT: SIERRA ARMY DEPOT OPEN-BURN, OPEN DETONATION ISSUES: RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRY The Facility Permitting Branch has requested that the Human and Ecological Risk Division assist in responding to a public inquiry by Mr. Jack Pastor of Lassen County on the incidence of cancer in Lassen County. His concerns include the potential for the agents released during open detonation activities to be the cause of cancer in surrounding area. In all cases where human disease state is examined, we work closely with the physicians and epidemiologists of the California Department of Health Services (DHS), as this constitutes both their direct area of expertise (DTSC employs no physicians or epidemiologists) as well as their overall mission. The DHS epidemiologist who has been working on this issue with Mr. Pastor is Dr. Sharon Campleman. We have spoken extensively with Dr. Campleman as well as with Robert Schlag, the Chief of the DHS Cancer Surveillance Section, who have provided us with their findings in the form of two pieces of correspondence with Mr. Pastor as well as correspondence with the Lassen County health officer. In addition, we have reviewed the additional information on cancer cases in Reno provided to you by Mr. Pastor and have discussed these with the DHS as well. We are in complete agreement with the findings of the DHS Cancer Surveillance Section which indicated that there is no significant increase in cancer incidence in the areas(s) surrounding the Sierra Army Depot. As to the additional information supplied by Mr. Pastor, the DHS has contacted the State of Nevada in order to determine if any of it was supplied to the State of California in their annual interstate data exchange (many people in California receive health care in Nevada). As the data stands now it cannot be used, since none of the reported cases are associated with names and addresses. Therefore, there is no way at this time to verify which, if any of these persons reside in Lassen County, California. Recall that such individual cancer data, including that which Mr. Pastor passed to the DTSC, is strictly confidential, and we will rely on the DHS to maintain that confidentiality in both obtaining the additional information from the State of Nevada, doing proper Quality Assurance to verify its accuracy, and analyzing the cancer cases where appropriate. Please note that the data used by the DHS in their epidemiological surveys has been validated through the year 1994/5, and that the Sierra Depot has been in operation for over 50 years. Since induced cancer has approximately a 20 year latency period, any reports of cancers which were detected between 1994 through the present (that are not in the possession of DHS) in all likelihood can not be related to the current operations at the facility, which began treating large quantities of explosives and propellants only in the past few years. Therefore we do not expect the conclusions of the DHS to change significantly if and when the State of Nevada provides them with more specific data on Californians receiving health care in Reno. ... -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at http://www.cpeo.org/lists/index.html. If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to: cpeo-military-subscribe@igc.topica.com _____________________________________________________________ Want to find the best email lists? Check out the Topica 20! http://www.topica.com/topica20 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Sierra Army Depot pollution crosses state lines Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Greenpeace Removes PCB Laden Transformer from Former US Base In Phili | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Sierra Army Depot pollution crosses state lines Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Greenpeace Removes PCB Laden Transformer from Former US Base In Phili |