From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:39:41 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Sierra Army Depot pollution crosses state lines |
The recent Reno Gazette series on the controversy over conventional munitions demilitarization at the Sierra Army Depot, in Herlong, California, points out a weakness in the nation's environmental laws. States are ill equipped to regulate pollution when the contamination and its victims cross state lines. While the federal government has specific statutory responsibility for dealing with other types of interstate crime, I don't know how well U.S. EPA is structured to intervene in cross-border environmental problems. The Sierra Army Depot, which I believe to be the nation's number one site both for the open burning of solid rocket fuel and the open detonation of conventional munitions, sits in Lassen County, California, near the Nevada border and the Pyramid Lake Paiute reservation. The nearest metropolitan area is Reno, Nevada. The Depot has conducted open burning and open detonation for more than three decades. Since 1980, the Army has operated under "interim status." Now it is seeking a 10-year permit from the California Department of Toxic Substances Control. In the permitting process, Nevada, its local governments, and the Paiutes have no official role, even though air emissions blow in their direction. (In fact, the Army is reportedly required to burn and detonate when the winds are blowing eastward, to protect the local California population.) This is clearly a situation in which the affected people are underrepresented. US EPA should play an active role in regulating the facility. Furthermore, California regulators have for years contended that there is no evidence of health problems from depot operations, but their research apparently stopped at the state border. That is, they only looked at the state's cancer registry, ignoring California residents treated in the nearby Reno area. A Lassen County businessman, concerned about illnesses in his family, started asking Reno hospitals for zip-code data, and he found that "the Nevada hospital figures alone are double the expected cancer rates for communities closest to Sierra Army Depot." (See Frank X. Mullen, Jr., "Herlong Site Tops in Burning; Neighbors Worry about Cancer," Reno Gazette, February 20, 2000. The new data doesn't prove that the open demilitarization of munitions is directly responsible for health problems in Lassen County, in Nevada, or on Paiute lands. In fact, it may be impossible to ever prove a direct association. More studies are likely. Meanwhile, the Army continues to burn or explode about 50 million pounds of weapons each year at the Sierra Army Depot. It argues that alternative disposal methods, designed to limit the release of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and other contaminants, are unnecessary and too costly, and the state of California thus far seems willing to accept the Army's position. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at http://www.cpeo.org/lists/index.html. If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to: cpeo-military-subscribe@igc.topica.com _____________________________________________________________ Want to find the best email lists? Check out the Topica 20! http://www.topica.com/topica20 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques & Nomans Island Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Sierra Army Depot - DTSC letter | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques & Nomans Island Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Sierra Army Depot - DTSC letter |