From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 23 Mar 2001 21:08:57 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] [Fwd: Waste Basket 3/23/01: "'BEEF'ing Up on the Taxpayer's Dime" ] |
This report serves as a reminder that the Defense Department is not the only federal agency that tests - and has a responsibility to clean up - high explosives. LS > Subject: Waste Basket 3/23/01: “'BEEF'ing Up on the Taxpayer's Dime” > Reply-To: staff@taxpayer.net > > $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ > The Waste Basket Vol. VI No. 9 March 23rd, 2001 > A Weekly Bulletin on Wasteful Government Spending from Taxpayers for Common > Sense > $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ > “BEEF”ing Up on the Taxpayer’s Dime > > Taxpayers paid for about $500,000 in unnecessary expenses at the Department > of Energy’s (DoE) Big Explosives Experimental Facility (BEEF), according to > a March report by DoE’s Office of the Inspector General. > > BEEF was established in 1997 as part of the stockpile stewardship program, > which aims to maintain the safety, reliability and performance of the U.S.’s > existing nuclear weapons. > > The Nevada facility was designed and is operated to perform large-load, high > explosive experiments that could not be performed at other DoE firing > facilities due to local limits on how large explosives can be. > > But “very few shots were performed at the facility, and even fewer actually > had to be done there,” according to the report. > > Since opening, 60 shots have been performed at the BEEF. No shots were > conducted at the facility in 19 of the 38 months it was open and only three > could not have been performed at other test sites cheaper. > > The facility may get even less use in the future. Only DoE’s Livermore lab > currently conducts tests at the facility. The trend is away from large-load > explosives experiments of the type conducted at the facility, according to > Livermore and Los Alamos lab personnel cited by the report. > > The report found that the Nevada DoE office did not review use of the > facility, believing that it was obligated to operate BEEF on a full-time > basis. The office requested and has received funding for full-time > operation, despite the facility’s limited use. > > Nearly half of the facility’s $1.3 million budget could be saved if the BEEF > operated only on an as-needed basis, according to the Inspector General. > > The Nevada Operations office plans to act on the Inspector General’s > recommendation to operate the facility on an as-needed basis and to > periodically review use of the facility to find ways to reduce operations at > the facility. > > It is unclear whether labs will be required to provide justification to use > BEEF for tests that could be performed at test sites closer to those > laboratories. The recommendation could yield even more savings for the > taxpayer from a reduction in travel expenses associated with conducting > tests at BEEF rather than at local labs. > > Nonetheless, the Inspector General’s recommendations will save taxpayers at > least half a million dollars a year. Taxpayers should be grateful for the > office’s vigilance. > > For more information, contact Christopher Burley at (202)-546-8500 ext. 114 > or chris@taxpayer.net. > > $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ > > INFO ABOUT TCS: staff@taxpayer.net or http://www.taxpayer.net > If you would like to add yourself to the Waste Basket listserve send an > email message to majordomo@taxpayer.net with the words "subscribe > waste_basket@taxpayer.net (your email address)" in the body of the message. > > To remove yourself from the list, send a message to the same address with > the words "unsubscribe waste_basket@taxpayer.net (your address)" in the body > of the message. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Senate "Encroachment" Hearings Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Spring Valley arsenic | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Senate "Encroachment" Hearings Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] 3/23/01 Vieques Digest |