From: | joelf@cape.com |
Date: | 2 Apr 2001 13:28:05 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Cape Cod Times: Hazard in "green bullets." |
CAPE COD TIMES 3/29/01 Hazard found in 'green' bullets Propellant used with the ammunition has left deposits of a probable carcinogen on the firing range; training halted. By KEVIN DENNEHY STAFF WRITER CAMP EDWARDS - A few years ago, so-called "green" ammunition seemed to be a promising cure to an ominous environmental problem. With newly developed ammunition that is tungsten-based, the Army saw the potential to continue training without leaving its ranges saturated with toxic chemicals and metals such as lead for years to come. And some of the first troops to train with the new ammo did so at Camp Edwards on the Upper Cape, where the military concedes years of training has polluted the soil and groundwater. But even then, the military knew there was a catch. The guns still required explosive propellants, to force the "green" bullets through the gun barrel toward their target. A new National Guard study reveals that concern over the propellants was apparently valid. And the Guard has agreed to cease firing on its small arms ranges near the base border until the study findings can be investigated further. Samples taken from the soil and air near three ranges deeper in the base after a training session last fall yielded levels of heavy metal contaminants, and has left some questioning the effectiveness of the lauded green ammunition. In the soil, investigators found traces of five propellant-related compounds including lead and manganese. Ingesting or breathing lead can cause brain damage. Of particular concern is the presence of 2,4 dinitrotoluene, a probable carcinogenic component of propellants used in M-16 firing, which was detected at levels nearly five times the state health standard in places on the small arms ranges. Air testing yielded downwind detections greater than upwind detections for five metals, including arsenic and chromium, a probable carcinogen. The next steps Health officials are already debating how meaningful the air sampling is, and just how much risk the firing poses to public health. But most involved in the massive cleanup at the Massachusetts Military Reservation agree that the latest data points to the need for more investigation of the one type of firing range training still allowed on the Upper Cape base. "It indicates that small arms firing over time deposits high levels of those propellants," said Bill Walsh-Rogalski an attorney for the federal Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA. "That's not a very good sign." For entire article go to: www.capecodonline.com/cctimes/archives/2001/mar/29/hazardfound29.htm ____________________________________________________ -- Joel Feigenbaum 24 Pond View Drive E. Sandwich MA 02537 (508)-833-0144 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Dry Cleaners Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Summary of Marine "Encroachment" Testimony | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Dry Cleaners Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Summary of Marine "Encroachment" Testimony |