From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 29 Mar 2001 20:56:08 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Dry Cleaners |
[The following letter and sign-on letter were submitted by Henry S. Cole <hcole@igc.org>. Though this legislation appears not to apply directly to military facilities, the technologies it promotes could have significant impact an military installations, where government-owned dry cleaners have been consistent sources of pollution. - LS] The CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES 7611 South Osborne Road, Suite 201, Upper Marlboro, MD 20772 Phone: (301) 780-7990, Fax: (301) 780-7988, Email: hcole@igc.org Henry S. Cole, Ph.D., President Dear Friends, I am writing to urge you to add your organization to the attached “group letter” supporting HR 978, The Small Business Pollution Prevention Opportunity Act. Safe Cleaning Tax Credit Legislation The Center for Environmentally Advanced Technologies is organizing a strong coalition to support this effort, including: * National, state and grassroots environmental organizations * Public health advocates * Green technology and building organizations * Wetcleaning and liquid CO2 interests * Environmentally supportive public officials Last year: With your support we were able to get strong bipartisan participation in both houses of Congress for legislation that provides a 20 percent tax credit for cleaners who purchase safe dry cleaning equipment. The language restricted the credit to inherently safe alternatives including wetcleaning and Liquid CO2. Both are commercially available with facilities cropping up across the nation. Now: Congressman Don Manzullo, new Chair of the House Small Business Committee, recently introduced this year's version, HR 978, The Small Business Pollution Prevention Opportunity Act. This year's bill is virtually the same as last year's with two exceptions: * HR 978 offers a 40 percent tax credit if the cleaner is located in an empowerment zone, enterprise community or renewal community. * HR 978 excludes equipment that uses hazardous solvents as the primary cleaning agent. The bill defines hazardous solvent as a chlorinated solvent, volatile organic compound (VOC) or any other substance regulated as hazardous, having carcinogenic potential in humans or possessing bioaccumulative properties. This language clearly includes wetcleaning and liquid CO2 for the tax credit, but excludes perchloroethylene and petroleum hydrocarbons. We are not certain whether the language on bioaccumulative properties will exclude silicone-based cleaning solvents. The industry claims that this solvent is safe however, there is a paucity of toxicological data on the chemicals. We are working to gather more information on this issue and will keep you posted. Please note that the liquid CO2 process uses only byproduct or waste CO2. No new CO2 is produced for this environmentally sound application. Please email <hcole@igc.org> or call (301 780-7990) to add your organization's name to the [below] sign-on letter. The Center for Environmentally Advanced Technologies is a new nonprofit organization created to promote the use of technologies that: * Eliminate the use of toxic and hazardous chemicals * Prevent pollution * Conserve resources * Improve public health and the environment * Create economic opportunity and jobs * Contribute to sustainable communities and ecosystems To achieve its mission in support of environmentally advanced technologies, the Center will: * Work for public programs including legislation that provide incentives for the development, commercialization, and widespread application of environmentally advanced technologies (e.g. tax incentives, government procurement policies, demonstration projects, etc.) * Identify and promote environmentally advanced technologies and give recognition to firms and institutions that develop, provide and apply these technologies The Center will conduct research, publish reports, conduct public outreach and media campaigns, organize coalitions, and engage in lobbying. Please let me know if you need more information or have any questions on the legislative campaign for safe dry cleaning or on the Center. With best wishes, Hank Cole *** Proposed Group Sign on Letter Date The Honorable ______________ Address Dear Congressman _______________: We the undersigned environmental, health and consumer advocacy organizations are writing to urge you to give your full and active support to H.R. 978, the Small Business Pollution Prevention Opportunity Act. Collectively, our organizations represent millions of Americans working for a better environment and for healthier communities, workplaces and technologies. This legislation will encourage many dry cleaners around the nation to switch from the use of a highly toxic solvent, perchloroethylene, to new cleaning technologies that are both safe and sustainable. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified perchloroethylene as a probable human carcinogen. Our organizations have been concerned for many years about the risks borne by dry cleaning workers and by those who live and work in apartment and office buildings with dry cleaners. A recent study by scientists from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) heightens our concerns. The report by Ruder et al., published in the February 2001 American Journal of Industrial Medicine, provides significant new evidence indicating that dry cleaning workers who experience long-term exposure to perchloroethylene have significantly excessive cancer death rates at sites including tongue, bladder, esophagus, intestine, lung and cervix. We are also concerned about the extensive damage to underground drinking water resources caused by perchloroethylene releases from dry cleaners, with national cleanup costs running into the billions of dollars. We are also aware that dry cleaners are increasingly facing a host of financial pressures related to the liabilities associated with perchloroethylene. These include increased regulations, bans by landlords, local zoning restrictions, and a virtual shutoff of bank loans. All of these problems can be prevented. Wetcleaning and liquid carbon dioxide technologies are commercially available and can totally eliminate the hazards and liabilities associated with perchloroethylene. The need for this action is greater than ever. Providing a tax incentive for cleaners who invest in safe, non-hazardous technologies is an important step toward safe cleaning technologies. It will also help tens of thousands of small and family-owned businesses sustain themselves in the face of these pressures. We therefore support the 20 percent tax credit for cleaners who purchase safe, non-hazardous technologies and are very pleased the tax credit will be doubled for cleaners located in empowerment zones, enterprise communities or renewal communities. We also strongly support the prevention principle at the heart of H.R. 978 with its exclusion of “advanced perc machines,” volatile hydrocarbon-based processes and other hazardous cleaning methods. As the bill is written, neither “advanced perc machines” nor petroleum hydrocarbon equipment would be eligible for tax credits. We strongly support the exclusion of these technologies and any others that include toxic or hazardous solvents. As long as dangerous chemicals are used, cleaners will have to deal with the many burdens associated with containment, monitoring, surveillance, and regulation. Eliminating hazardous chemicals eliminates these burdens. Let's help dry cleaners, our vital neighborhood enterprises, make the switch to safer technologies. We urge you to pass H.R. 978 and the enormous environmental, health and economic benefits that it provides. Signed: (List of organizations) -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Skaggs Island Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Cape Cod Times: Hazard in "green bullets." | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Skaggs Island Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Cape Cod Times: Hazard in "green bullets." |