From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 24 Jul 2001 21:19:58 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] "Vieques Health Risks Questioned" |
Washington Times http://www.washtimes.com/national/20010716-20037832.htm July 16, 2001 Pg. 3 Vieques Health Risks Questioned By Rowan Scarborough, The Washington Times A series of studies this year cast doubt on charges that the Navy's practice bombing on Vieques island causes health problems for residents. The studies concluded that the Puerto Rican island's water supply was not contaminated by the live-fire exercises, nor were there ill-health effects from the use of depleted uranium ammunition in 1999. Meanwhile, the U.S. Public Health Service continues to study cancer rates on Vieques, after a limited analysis found a slightly higher rate among the island's 9,000 residents compared with Puerto Rico's 3.8 million citizens. Congressional proponents of keeping the range open are citing the studies to refute Democratic Party claims that the 60-year-old range poses a health hazard to the residents of Vieques. continued... http://www.washtimes.com/national/20010716-20037832.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Reps. Blumenauer & Riley Introduce UXO Legislation Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Another View on Vieques | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Reps. Blumenauer & Riley Introduce UXO Legislation Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Another View on Vieques |