From: | StellaVB@aol.com |
Date: | 6 Aug 2001 19:06:56 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] EPA rules against Army appeal.../MMR |
I have a question (or two) regarding this posting dated April 11, 2001, a letter addressed to General Davis and Mr. Fatz. I have heard that certain ordnance cannot be moved and should be blown up in place yet I read in: 2. Threat from Storage, 3rd paragraph, first sentence: "...the NGB moved the potentially high explosive rounds to bunkers at the ammunition supply point at MMR." YET in B. Whether Use of the Controlled Demolition Chamber is Exempt from RCRA Permitting Requirements by CERCLA subsection 121(e), first paragraph, 3rd sentence: "....a time critical removal action occurs when munitions not safe to move are blown in place and when munitions deemed safe to move are moved to the DDESB-approved sotrage facility." I believe I've asked this question before, what is the criteria that 'deems' munitions safe or unsafe to move. The first quote talked of moving potentially high explosives and then the second quote talks of munitions not being safe to move. Who determines when munitions are safe to move, DoD? EPA? Both? Are all agencies in agreement with this criteria? If not, why not? Thanks, Stella Bourassa ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] ITRC releases three documents on innovativeenvironmental tech... Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] APG/Rep. Blumenhauer | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] ITRC releases three documents on innovativeenvironmental tech... Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] APG/Rep. Blumenhauer |