From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 28 Nov 2001 23:14:23 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Cleveland FUDS |
>From the Cleveland Scene, November 22, 2001 Is It Safe? Federal officials say an old mustard gas pit poses no health risks. Others aren't so sure. By Martin Kuz A worker in the Allied Carpet Inc. warehouse grabs his right elbow in mock pain. "Ohh," he moans. "Mustard gas." ... Not long ago, officials with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers swept through the building, which in 1918 housed a starkly different enterprise. Known then as the Cleveland Plant, it served as a World War I production facility for the chemical agent mustard. ... The agency bears the task of surveying and potentially cleaning up more than 9,000 Formerly Used Defense Sites, or FUDS, across the country, including 90 in Ohio. The testing gauges whether chemical weapons, munitions, and other war-related detritus dumped at the retired facilities pose a health hazard. Hampered by its own blunders and incomplete disposal records -- or no records at all -- the Corps on occasion has made a mess of FUDS and similar cleanup projects: ... For the entire article, see http://www.clevescene.com/issues/2001-11-22/news.html/1/index.html -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] San Diego Naval Training Center Next by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Defense comments on EPA draft FUDS policy | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] San Diego Naval Training Center Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Defense comments on EPA draft FUDS policy |