From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 29 Nov 2001 14:07:05 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RE: [CPEO-MEF] Defense comments on EPA draft FUDS policy |
[------ Original Message Follows ------] To: cpeo-military <cpeo-military@igc.topica.com> From: StellaVB@aol.com Subject: Re: Defense comments on EPA draft FUDS policy Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:35:25 EST Though Camp Bonneville is not a FUDS site, I do know that without the enormous influence of EPA on USACE, this site would probably have gone to the 'wayside' with contamination issues never resolved appropriately. I also had a hard time following exactly what this document was 'getting at' but if I read it right, it seems USACE has the 'higher authority'??? If so, this is not appropriate based on what I've witnessed with the Corps regarding CB. I do know, by personal experience, that I am extremely grateful for EPA's role regarding methodologies and cleanup on Camp Bonneville. Stella Bourassa [------ End Of Original Message -------] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Cleveland FUDS Next by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Defense comments on EPA draft FUDS policy | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Cleveland FUDS Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Defense comments on EPA draft FUDS policy |