From: | loc@icx.net |
Date: | 21 Jan 2002 16:34:40 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] DU munitions |
Steven Pollack's concern about Al Qaida using depleted uranium as a dirty nuclear weapon is completely misplaced. DU is barely radioactive. It's DEPLETED in U-235, the primary radioactive isotope in naturally occuring uranium. Terrorists wanting to build a dirty nuclear bomb would more likely steal an X-ray or other source using Co-60, Sr-90, Cs-137, or other "hot" isotope from a radiological perspective. Of course, working with those is pretty dangerous to whoever is building and transporting the bomb, which makes the whole concept less attractive to the individuals involved. The US military uses DU weapons for three excellent reasons: 1. Incredible penetrating power 2. Self-sharpening 3. Cheap and plentiful Let's face it, war is hell on the environment and people's health, whether you use DU or conventional munitions. I don't believe in unduly handicapping our military in the field; DU munitions gives them a strong advantage, especially in tank-killing operations. After all, we're talking about immediate life-and-death situations, not theoretical future cancer cases. And by the way, DU is such a heavy element that the particles fall out of the air immediately and are difficult to re-suspend. Thus actual exposures after the immediate hit are negligable. There are plenty of places in this country where the bedrock is a low-grade uranium ore, giving you more exposure than would occur if you'd had a tank hit in your backyard. We'd be better off focusing our energy on real problems, then trying to spread disinformation about non-problems in the name of a politically correct cause. Susan Gawarecki | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] EPA Draft Public Involvement Implementation Next by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] DU munitions | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] EPA Draft Public Involvement Implementation Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] DU munitions |