[CPEO-MEF] RE: Gawarecki's reply to DU query

[CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org>]

[------ Original Message Follows ------]
To: cpeo-military <cpeo-military@igc.topica.com>
From: olah@speagle.com
Subject: RE: Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 454
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:41:38 -0600
Message-ID: <0.700000380.1305209205-1463792126-1011714498@topica.com>
X-Topica-Id: <1011714495.inmta004.15238.1059306>
X-Topica-Loop: 700000380
Return-Path: <olah@speagle.com>
Received: (qmail 24535 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2002 15:48:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 24530 invoked by uid 0); 22 Jan 2002 15:48:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO speagle.com) (64.73.100.1)
  by inmta004.topica.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2002 15:48:14 -0000
Received: from office ([64.73.100.23]) by speagle.com
	with SMTP (IOA-IPAD 2.54) id 6032400; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:48:08 -0600 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <0.700000380.2069808960-1463792382-1011700359@topica.com>

please post.

RE: Gawarecki's reply to DU query

Such an angry answer to a simple straight-forward question.  Manners
aside, if one follows the "logic" offered by Gawarski's reply, it would 
be sensible for all of us to pick up a carton of cigarettes for our kids 
on the way home from work tonight...

Laura

[------ End Of Original Message -------]