From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 10 May 2002 20:30:54 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] Third-Party lawsuits |
From: pamela larsen <pjlayton@firstpobox.com> I agree that third party lawsuits are needed. I was involved with a group that questioned releases from a solid waste incinerator. This incinerator was basically operated by a "quasi" county government agency and it was very hard to regulate because representatives of county government sat on state air quality and solid waste boards. It was only, and I repeat only, thorough local residents and third party lawsuits that this incinerator was required to clean up its act. EPA would not act (overfile on the state) until locals had sued because they feared state political pressure. The third party lawsuits and local group did provide some political cover for regulators to finally do their job without encountering political pressure from within, but without the local resident law suits, nothing would have happened. I think this example is somewhat analogous to what Lenny is saying. Locals can't oppose a government agency when the agency is regulated by another federal agency. EPA is sometimes so politically compromised it can't do its job. We saw this both with the state and EPA. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Third-Party lawsuits Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Homeless Shelter Takes Root at Base | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Third-Party lawsuits Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Homeless Shelter Takes Root at Base |