From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 24 Jun 2002 15:24:06 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Perchlorate: How much is too much? |
Perchlorate: How much is too much? Research disparity delays federal safety standard By KEVIN DENNEHY STAFF WRITER Helen Bresnahan can't say if chemicals in the water have aggravated her thyroid condition. But these days, she wonders. The retired teacher just knows that she's feeling more sluggish than before, weight doesn't come off as easily as it used to. And she keeps hearing about this chemical called perchlorate, a substance that has been linked to thyroid conditions, and is creeping off nearby Camp Edwards toward the Bourne Water District water supply. "I've only lived here since 1993, year round. I came from New Jersey, you know, the chemical state. "But their water may be cleaner than what I've been drinking in this lovely part of the world," laments Bresnahan, who retired to a gray, shingled house with wide windows that overlook Phinneys Harbor. Bresnahan is not the only one wondering if it's safe to drink water tainted by perchlorate. The confounding chemical has been discovered in water supplies from California to Cape Cod that serve more than 20 million Americans. But while millions of dollars have been spent on research over several years, there is still no answer to this question: How much perchlorate is too much? Scientists know this much: Perchlorate affects the functions of the human thyroid. In fact, until the mid-1960s, it was used to treat people with overactive thyroids. If it's consumed by children, it can affect their growth rate, behavior, learning capability, even IQ level. For expectant mothers, it may influence how their fetus develops. In adults, it can alter metabolism rates. And the federal Environmental Protection Agency recently confirmed that the chemical is a carcinogen, that at high enough levels it has caused tumors in lab animals. Beyond that, there are more questions than answers. Scientists disagree on just what dose would cause harm over a lifetime, or even during critical growth periods. That means a federal standard won't likely be in place for years - frustrating news for communities such as Bourne, where the chemical was recently found at trace levels in three water supply wells. There simply isn't the magic number for safety that there is for other chemicals found in the cleanup of the Massachusetts Military Reservation, where the Air Force and Army will spend $1 billion to treat a series of contamination plumes caused by fuels, solvents and explosive materials. This article can be viewed in its entirety at: http://www.capecodonline.com/cctimes/perchloratehow23.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Guardian Trust discussion Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Trees may hold clues in Fallon cancer cluster | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Guardian Trust discussion Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Trees may hold clues in Fallon cancer cluster |