From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 3 Oct 2002 21:39:32 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] PERCHLORATE DETECTED IN ABERDEEN, MD CITY WELLS |
Press Advisory: October 3, 2002 For Immediate Release FOR MORE INFORMATION: Glenda Bowling, APGSCC President 410-272-5925 Cal Baier-Anderson, Ph.D. University of Maryland, Baltimore 410-706-8196 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE?S FAILURE TO ALLOW APG TO CONDUCT EMERGENCY RESPONSE JEOPARDIZES PUBLIC HEALTH PERCHLORATE DETECTED IN ABERDEEN, MD CITY WELLS DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REFUSES REQUEST TO TREAT CONTAMINATION CAUSED BY TRAINING ACTIVITIES IN CAMP STANTON, APG COMMUNITY CALLS FOR IMMEDIATE CLEANUP! On October 1, 2002, Aberdeen Proving Ground notified the City of Aberdeen and concerned citizens that 1 ppb perchlorate was detected in the finished water. The actual water sample was collected on September 24. Due to the lag time between collecting the water sample and receiving the analytical results, the community has been consuming drinking water with perchlorate at the maximum level that is considered by Maryland Department of the Environment and EPA Region III to be safe. While the actual concentration of perchlorate in the finished water is expected to fluctuate: The Aberdeen well field is contaminated with perchlorate from military activities, and this contamination must be treated now. Aberdeen Proving Ground Superfund Citizens Coalition has requested that APG construct an emergency portable treatment system to remove the perchlorate from the drinking water. The Department of Defense has thus far not permitted APG to do so. Glenda Bowling, president of APGSCC, said the City of Aberdeen, APG and DoD are not taking appropriate steps to protect the public; ?The fact is we have been drinking perchlorate tainted water and continue to be at a high risk for exposure.? Bowling added, ?We are concerned about the city?s decision to shut down one well and lower the production of others. This scenario is not necessarily wise, the contaminated plume has no barriers, it will continue to move toward and contaminate the operating wells and even potentially increase perchlorate levels in them. ? The perchlorate contamination is the result of training activities in Camp Stanton, Aberdeen Proving Ground. Perchlorate can alter normal thyroid function. Proper thyroid function is necessary to normal growth and development in babies and children. Long term exposure to perchlorate has been linked to thyroid cancer. For more than a decade APGSCC has closely followed contamination issues at APG, working with the Army and the EPA to develop solutions to the complex problems of environmental contamination at this important Superfund site. APGSCC has repeatedly argued that the perchlorate, which was first detected in the groundwater near the City of Aberdeen Production wells in April 2001, that it is inevitable that the contamination will be detected in finished water. Therefore we urged APG to be proactive and install a treatment system to remove perchlorate from the City of Aberdeen production wells. On August 20, 2002 the Maryland Department of the Environment sent a letter (1) to the City of Aberdeen indicating that if concentrations in the finished water are to rise above 1 ppb, then the city must notify the public of the presence of perchlorate and advise the public that ?persons more likely to be sensitive to perchlorate should avoid using tap water for drinking or cooking.? Sensitive persons are defined as ?pregnant women, women who are breast feeding, children under 3 years of age, and individuals known to have or are predisposed to a hypothyroid (i.e., low thyroid hormone) condition.? Instead of demonstrating foresight and designing a treatment system, the Department of Defense issued a draft guidance PROHIBITING any military entity from taking action to address perchlorate contamination (2). The Department of Defense is therefore directly responsible for the current unnecessary exposure of Aberdeen residents to perchlorate. DOD Scared of Magnitude of Perchlorate Contamination Why should the Department of Defense take an active role in preventing APG from addressing perchlorate contamination? The answer is because the perchlorate contamination problem is expected to be so widespread at current and former defense installations that the DOD is afraid of how much it will cost to clean it up to protect human health. Instead they are focussing their attention on pressuring the EPA to select a higher concentration as the health-protective cleanup level. DoD?s position is disheartening and fear provoking, water is a necessity of life, people at risk and children should not be forced to drink contaminated water. The community should not have to plea with the Army to treat our drinking water. According to Mr. Lenny Siegel, director of the Center for Public Environmental Oversight, perchlorate has been found in hundreds of drinking water sources in California, as well as in Lake Mead in Nevada (3). Much of this contamination can be directly linked to the activities of the military or military contractors. FEDERAL ELECTED OFFICIALS AWARE OF CRITICAL ISSUES APGSCC calls on elected officials to protect public health by urging APG to install a treatment system on contaminated Aberdeen wells now! REFERENCES (1) Letter from Robert M. Summers, Director, Water Management Administration, Maryland Department of the Environment to Peter A. Dacey, City Manager, City of Aberdeen, Maryland, dated August 20, 2002. (2) Memorandum for Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health) Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Environment) Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health) Staff Director, Environment and Safety, Defense Logistics Agency Support Services (DSS-E). Subject: Interim Guidance on Sampling for Ammonium Perchlorate Contamination, Signed by John Paul Woodley, Jr., Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Environment). (3) ?Perchlorate Summary?, Citizen?s Report on the Military and the Environment, The Center for Public Environmental Oversight, September 2002. Volume IX, Number 2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Malaria Research Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Security at APG and elsewhere | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Malaria Research Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Security at APG and elsewhere |