From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 14 Oct 2002 22:04:19 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Woodley's letters |
Last Friday (October 11, 2002) CPEO posted the text of two letters from Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Environment) John Paul Woodley, Jr. The letters, dated October 4, 2002, were addressed to Assistant EPA Administrator (Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response) Marianne Horinko and California official Stan Phillippe, who serves as Chair of the Federal Facilities Subcommittee of the Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials. The letters sought to resolve the growing dispute between the Defense Department and its environmental regulators over the degree to which regulators could enforce environmental cleanup requirements after the signing of Records of Decision (RODs). That dispute reportedly was holding up the signing of new RODS at Defense facilities throughout the country. Woodley appears to address regulators' primary concern in his letter to the states. He wrote, "Unequivocally, CERCLA [the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act] applies in an enforceable manner to us in the post-ROD phases of remedial implementation, operation and maintenance, and review." To EPA he stated, "Surely we do not assert that EPA's role at a contamination site governed by CERCLA, in which the remedy chosen involves long-term stewardship to protect the public health from toxic releases, is one of consultation alone." Woodley clarified that the purpose of controversial memos, from his office, the Army, and Air Force, was to ensure that disputes over long-term management at cleanup sites not prevent the implementation of physical remedies. Horinko agreed to this principle in a July 29, 2002 letter to Woodley. Furthermore, he stated, "It is DoD's view that we collectively need to re-focus our environmental restoration program upon substantive performance of the remedial action and away from resource intensive document preparation and review that is costly and time consuming without commensurate environmental and human health benefit." He also wrote, "Our engagement with EPA and States, therefore, has centered less on technical designations of respective post-ROD authorities and more on a systemic evolution of the cleanup process towards performance, efficiency and transparency. We have sought to incorporate the post-ROD phases of remedial actions into the ROD itself by ensuring ROD provisions fully focus on and capture essential performance requirements and factors...." Woodley praised agreements at Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts and Travis Air Force Base, California, based on this "performance-based" formula. Noting DOD's desire that the requirements of its cleanup program match those covering EPA-led and private CERCLA sites, Woodley recommended to EPA, "As our approach to long-term stewardship matures, I recommend the development of a rule of general applicability under CERCLA to address these issues globally." *** Woodley's olive branch is welcome. I hope that it not only helps resolves the dispute over enforcement and long-term stewardship, but that it starts to rebuild the level of trust among cleanup stakeholders. I share his belief that performance, not the generation and review of documents, should guide the military's cleanup program. Obviously - I think all parties agree - performance responsibilities still need to be agreed upon, in writing. I also like his suggestion that EPA work with the Defense Department - and presumably others - to develop a rule governing long-term stewardship. I believe that such a rule should set standards to be met by any entity promising to conduct long-term monitoring, and that one of those standards be the capability and capacity to modify remedies should they prove unprotective, should long-term operations appear unlikely to reach remedial objectives, or if research and development makes better alternatives feasible. Lenny -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] New web site on ordnance and explosives Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Woodley's letters | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] New web site on ordnance and explosives Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Woodley's letters |