From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 23 Oct 2002 15:00:20 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Sen. Jeffords, Lieberman, and Leahy Oppose DoD Exemptions from Envi |
October 22, 2002 Senators Jeffords, Lieberman, and Leahy Oppose Exemptions for Defense Department from Environmental Laws - Call on DOD Authorization Conferees to Reject House Actions to Weaken Environmental Protections - WASHINGTON, DC- U.S. Sens. Jim Jeffords, I - Vt., Joseph Lieberman, D - Conn., and Patrick Leahy, D - Vt., today voiced strong opposition to a series of exemptions from environmental laws in the Department of Defense (DOD) Authorization bill for FY 2003. The legislation is currently in a House/Senate Conference Committee. The House version of the bill (H.R. 4546) includes broad exemptions from the Endangered Species Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. These exemptions were requested by the Department of Defense as part of the Range Readiness and Preservation Initiative. The Senate version does not contain any of those exemptions. Jeffords, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works said, "Blanket legislative exemptions, such as those found in the House authorization bill, are simply not needed. Both the Endangered Species Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act already grant the military special flexibility to meet training needs. The American people understand the military's need to train, but government agencies are not above the law." Lieberman said, "Chairman Levin has worked diligently to mitigate any weakening of our environmental laws through these provisions, and I applaud his leadership. But it remains my position that, when profound changes to our environmental protection regime are at stake, we should not go through the legislative backdoor or side door. We owe it to the American people to go through the front door-and that should have entailed full consideration of the proposals in the Environment and Public Works committee." Leahy said, "The House is trying to create a big loophole in our environmental laws for a problem that just doesn't exist. For years the Interior and Defense Departments have been successfully cooperating in meeting military readiness needs without this loophole." Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act provides an exemption for any agency action for reasons of national security. According to the Fish and Wildlife Service, the Secretary of Defense has never sought a Section 7 exemption. In the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the Secretary of the Interior currently has wide discretion under Section 3 of the Act to determine when the incidental "taking" or killing of migratory birds is permissible for the armed forces and to develop permit regulations within the law's conservation context. In fact, the Fish and Wildlife Service and Department of Defense are close to finalizing a Memorandum of Agreement that would establish an administrative process to resolve future migratory bird disputes. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Liability concerns loom over Johnston dump Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Toxic Ranges | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Liability concerns loom over Johnston dump Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] R&D Symposium in December |