RE: [CPEO-MEF] Pentagon accused of attacking migratory bird law

[themissinglink@eznetinc.com]

"In a legal brief, Navy lawyers argued that by killing off many of the
island's birds, the exercises benefited Frew, because "bird-watchers get
more enjoyment spotting a rare bird than they do spotting a common one.""

Nice.  I guess the DOD feels the same way about clean air and water.  The
more they pollute of America the more enjoyment we all get from the pockets
of clean air and water that are left over.


Steven Pollack
660 Vernon Ave
Glencoe, IL 60022
888-300-8031
www.FamilyJeweler.com/fortweb/amendIII.htm

-----Original Message-----
From: CPEO Moderator [mailto:cpeo@cpeo.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:59 AM
To: cpeo-military@igc.topica.com
Subject: [CPEO-MEF] Pentagon accused of attacking migratory bird law

Pentagon accused of attacking migratory bird law
By Jeff Nesmith / Cox News Service
10-23-02

WASHINGTON -- Environmental groups and two House Democrats assailed the
Pentagon on Tuesday for seeking an exemption from America's oldest
environmental conservation law, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918.

The exemption would overturn the ruling of a federal court that this
year rejected a Navy claim that by killing migratory birds with its
target practice on a small Pacific island, it was making them rare and
increasing the pleasure of birdwatchers.

The special exemption would be included in language the Bush
administration wants inserted into a Defense Department budget
authorization bill for fiscal 2003. The bill is being negotiated by
House and Senate conferees.

"The exemption seeks to allow DOD to kill migratory birds including
hawks, robins, and owls with little or no oversight," 14 environmental
groups, including the Audubon Society, the National Wildlife Federation
and the World Wildlife Fund, charged in a written statement.

"The Migratory Bird Treaty Act provides the only source of protection
for hundreds of species of migratory birds that visit or live on the 25
million acres of land controlled by the Defense Department," the groups
added.

Democratic Reps. Nick Rahall of West Virginia and John Dingell of
Michigan said the language would declare that the Pentagon did not have
to comply with the 1918 law for activity that occurs "during a military
readiness activity."

It was such an activity -- bombing practice and shelling at the 200-acre
Pacific island, Farallon de Medinilla, near Saipan -- that led Northern
Marianas birdwatcher Ralph Frew to sue the Defense Department last year.

In a legal brief, Navy lawyers argued that by killing off many of the
island's birds, the exercises benefited Frew, because "bird-watchers get
more enjoyment spotting a rare bird than they do spotting a common one."

This article can be viewed at:
http://www.coxnews.com/newsservice/stories/2002/1023-BIRDS.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~