From: | christinebettencourt@earthlink.net |
Date: | 25 Oct 2002 18:55:21 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] Toxic Ranges |
<0.700000380.993761827-1463792382-1035399192@topica.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Mass deaths resulting from openly burning hazardous, toxic and radio-active wastes on military ranges do not all happen the same day. Deaths that do are misdiagnosed due to medical incompetance due to lack of education that result in lack of accurate diagnostic testing. Hazardous waste exposures are documented by government to result in reversable painful damages, irreversable painful damages and increased mortality. The "square miles of OEW and UXO being burned" that I refer to is the multi-range area at Fort Ord. It is a 20,000 acre/30 square mile area used since 1917 as a bombing and infantry range. It is also a munitions landfill which is documented in pictures and base reports. The press refuses to cover it. The politicians, except Assemblyman Fred Keeley, refuse to address it. The land is being given to government and political entities for redevelopement. Collateral damages such as human lives apppears insignificant when such a valuable piece of California's coastal property is going to make so many so much money. Cleaning safe and using appropriate technology would take too long and cost too much as far as those waiting to gain are concern. Money talks, life walks, its simple as that. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Navy secretary promises cooperation in Nev. leukemia probe Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Toxic Ranges | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Toxic Ranges Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Toxic Ranges |