From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 29 Oct 2002 16:33:24 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Marines worry environmentalists to use old law to limit training |
Marines worry environmentalists will use old law to limit needed training on bombing range outside Yuma; environmentalist says White House is the problem, not the Marines By T.M. Shultz Oct 27, 2002 Which is worth more ? saving lives or saving a few birds? It's a question Congress is grappling with as the country's war on terrorism begins its seemingly inevitable march from Afghanistan to Iraq. Marine Corps officials here in Yuma say all they're asking for are some common-sense clarifications to the 1918 Migratory Bird Treaty Act and five other environmental laws that stand in the way of effective training. Environmentalists say the military, particularly the Marine Corps, isn't to blame. It's being used by its civilian bosses from the Bush administration to help push through a wholesale retreat from needed environmental protections. "We feel that the military has been reaching out to the conservation community for years to try to build alliances and help people understand the value of environmentalism," said Peter Galvin, conservation biologist for the Center for Biological Diversity. Now, he said, all the good will built up by the Marine Corps could disappear because of the politicians who run the armed services. "They're going to set back the conservation community's relationship with the military by 20 years," Galvin said. In a recent telephone interview, Galvin told The Sun he sees no problems with the Marine Corps' management of the Barry M. Goldwater Range east of Yuma. Marines have a reputation as being more "green" than the other military services, Galvin said, and he agrees that they have long gone out of their way to accommodate environmental concerns. "Unfortunately, under the Bush administration what we've seen is a mean-spirited assault on environmental laws, using ? we feel inappropriately ? hot-button issues such as national security to sway people into believing that environmental laws have to be weakened in order for our country to be safe and secure," Galvin said. This article can be viewed at: http://yumasun.com/artman/publish/print/printer_2364.shtml ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Plume focus of Rialto meeting Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] RAB questions | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Plume focus of Rialto meeting Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] RAB questions |