From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 7 Nov 2002 05:22:26 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] The Guardian Trust Pilot Study |
[Because The Guardian Trust is being designed to function at a variety of cleanup sites, including Brownfields and closing military bases, we are posting this summary on both our listservers. Please excuse the cross posting. - LS] Connecticut-based MGP Environmental Partners has released "The Guardian Trust Pilot Study Report." Though "Pilot" often connotes a trial run, this Pilot Study is more of a feasibility study. The report describes the proposed role of The Guardian Trust: "The Guardian Trust is intended to assure that certain institutional and engineering controls are maintained over the long-term after a cleanup has been completed and approved by the environmental agencies, and that information about these controls is maintained and available to the public and interested stakeholders." It also explains: "The Guardian Trust could assume the remediator's responsibilities to assure the long-term stewardship of ICs [institutional controls] and ECs [engineering controls], not as a substitute with respect to the environmental agencies' enforcement authority, but as an entity legally positioned and obligated to perform. The Guardian Trust would receive a property interest from the remediator, consistent with property law of the state in which the site is located, and thereafter carry out the remediator's responsibilities. This is a role that most government agencies are reluctant or unable to play even though it is critically important in the remediation scheme. The ability of a remediator to transfer these responsibilities to The Guardian Trust, a single-purpose entity formed to serve as a steward for ICs and ECs, would enable remediators to satisfy long-term obligations on a cost advantaged basis based upon the economies of scale offered by The Guardian Trust. Thereafter, properties can be redeveloped and transferred with the confidence and assurance that environmental conditions remaining on remediated sites will be properly monitored and managed...." The pilot study found that The Guardian Trust could exercise these functions under Pennsylvania's hazardous waste laws and at Department of Defense facilities, including closing bases. It also explored the complex tax rules that could apply to various forms of corporate organization, leaving some uncertainty whether it would be possible for a remediator to get a tax break in transferring its responsibilities to The Guardian Trust. In fact, The Guardian Trust might end up as an entity other than a legal trust: "... upon further analysis as part of the implementation of The Guardian Trust, it may turn out that a not-for-profit charitable trust is not necessary or is too burdensome that it becomes counter to the mission of The Guardian Trust. It is interesting to note that despite the perceived advantages of a not-for-profit charitable trust, the Advisory Committee Findings do not require either feature as a fundamental component of The Guardian Trust moving forward." The report describe the potential services that The Guardian Trust expects to provide. Those would include remedy-specific monitoring programs, such as physical inspections and a periodic review of land records. It plans to develop an expansive database and information system. The Trust may also assume financial responsibility for the maintenance of ICs and ECs, including possibly the funding and/or conducting of "additional remedial actions related to a breach of ICs and ECs." In my view, the Guardian Trust is a creative approach to long-term stewardship at both private and federal cleanup sites. There is no way to determine, at this point, how well it will work because so much of its structure and activities remain vague or undefined. In fact, the most significant lesson of the "Pilot Study" is that the creation of single-purpose stewardship entity is complex and difficult. For more information, including the full 50-page report, contact Bruce-Sean Reshen at <reshen@mindspring.com>. Lenny -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Colorado challenges DIMP study Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Guardian Trust | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Colorado challenges DIMP study Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] The Guardian Trust Pilot Study |