From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 18 Nov 2002 19:45:36 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Those near base fear plan to end testing of water |
[Indiana] Those near base fear plan to end testing of water Army says pollution at ex-test-firing range doesn't appear to be moving from the site. By Tammy Webber tammy.webber@indystar.com November 17, 2002 Big Creek flows through a former military test-firing range riddled with unexploded shells and more than 150,000 pounds of depleted uranium -- an area so dangerous the Army plans to fence it off forever rather than attempt to clean it up. But what really worries residents near the 55,000-acre Jefferson Proving Ground in southeastern Indiana is an Army plan made public last week to stop monitoring the creek and groundwater for depleted uranium contamination. "We have no assurance that stuff won't wash down through here over time," said Robert Rosenthal, who lives along Big Creek less than two miles from the site. "At the very least, there ought to be long-term monitoring downstream of the site. Many of us have wells within a stone's throw of the creek." Jefferson Proving Ground is one of at least nine Indiana military installations contaminated over the years by everything from explosives and heavy metals to polychlorinated biphenyls, known as PCBs, and petroleum. All of them, including a portion of the proving grounds, have undergone either full or partial environmental cleanups. Besides the proving grounds, the most highly polluted sites are the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Crane and the Indiana Army Ammunition Plant in Charlestown, environment officials said. But only the proving ground -- which straddles Jefferson, Jennings and Ripley counties -- includes areas deemed too polluted and expensive to clean up. The Army, which stopped firing depleted-uranium rounds eight years ago, wants the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to terminate the Army's license to possess the radioactive metal at that site; if that happens, monitoring would no longer be required, said Claudia Craig, chief of the NRC facilities decommissioning section. This article can be viewed at: http://www.indystar.com/print/articles/5/001556-8985-009.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Regulatory Framework Profile Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] The Navy, a top polluter, botched cleanup | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Regulatory Framework Profile Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] The Navy, a top polluter, botched cleanup |