From: | Ihray@aol.com |
Date: | 5 Dec 2002 03:37:38 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] What's RIGHT with the way RABs are set up? |
_From last week's question, "What's wrong . . .," and lists of frustrating elements, the natural corollary might be "What's right?" DoD Public Participation Guidance instructs all RAB members, "RAB members will: Document decisions at meetings and make the information available to the general public." The instruction does not single out the community RAB members, rather "DoD, EPA, state Ecology (typical), state, local and tribal governments, and the affected community." The military, regulators, and governments meet the instruction easily with huge resources to maintain web sites, information services, and sometimes provide newspaper articles. The local community typically doesn't poke around government web sites or information services unless a compelling reason becomes known. So information for the "affected community" has to be directed to the places where the community will see it in their normal news uptake. Community RAB members and other local people can meet the instruction and job description with fewer resources but great influence on the conduct of the cleanup project. The idea is - when it's in view, it should work better. Individual members can write letters and articles to newspapers outlining the project status, interests to the community, their concerns, questions, and advice. Typical concerns that "an individual can't speak for the RAB" are easily overcome by simply speaking for one's self. Ad hoc non-RAB groups are a boon. A volunteer supported web site (no government money) is well within the resources of a few people - and once the site becomes known, "pages downloaded" register in the hundreds and thousands. A place for viewer intera ction stimulates community participation. Local neighborhood and homeowner's associations, service clubs, recreation groups, are natural places to post and receive information. They typically have newsletters. All in the intent and spirit of open discourse. Ian Ray, member Camp Bonneville, Washington RAB ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Unexploded Arms Require Big Cleanup At 16,000 U.S. Sites Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Sand, designed for beaches, would have to be screened | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] U.S. Air Force, Navy sued Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Sand, designed for beaches, would have to be screened |