From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 10 Jan 2003 21:05:25 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Camp Bonneville Letter |
[The following was letter was sent by Karen Kingston <Karen4theCamp@cs.com>] January 9, 2003 To: Sean Sheldrake, WA EPA Barry Rogowski, WA Department of Ecology Harry Craig, EPA Greg Johnson, WA Department of Ecology RE: BRAC Camp Bonneville Military Reservation Dear Sirs: However much I appreciate the excellent working relationship you each provide I must, on behalf of the residents of the good State of Washington, request the following: Due to the Camp Bonneville Department of Defense Restoration Advisory Board meeting last evening, January 8, 2003 at Camp Killpack, I respectfully request further action by legal departments, available to both you and I, looking into the Army violation for not having, maintaining or making available their Administrative Record, with index, on behalf of their past and ongoing work at Camp Bonneville Military Reservation; post BRAC 1996. This matter was brought to my attention on December 10th, 2002. I have worked with Sean Sheldrake (WA EPA) and we resolved the question as to a valid and prior Administrative Record by the US Army; they indeed do not have one in place other than the "Information Repository" on file without an index, at several community locations in Washington State. The "Information Repository" is a separate formality, one of several mandated by the National Contingency Plan and therefore does not exclude an Administrative Record and its maintenance. At last nights meeting Eric Waehline, US Army BRAC Coordinator, stated that the prior contamination removals and pending work at the Camp was not under completed CERCLA, or at the very most, was a "debatable issue, only". I was under the impression that the Army has, in fact, conducted work of a time critical removal action start and must follow CERCLA in order to obtain permit exemptions for past and ongoing work. Such permits require an AR. Please advise me, if I am in error. In as much as I enjoy a debate, the BRAC closure and characterization of contamination, buried munitions, and UXO, already known at Camp Bonneville, should prudently follow legal requirements and standards and not be allowed for an Army debate folly. Standards, restrictions, regulations, and requirements have been set in place to protect the citizens of our great State and America. I request this matter to be resolved by any legal options available, i.e., the Washington State Attorney General. Please copy, to me, any investigation and/or remediation of this matter and the legal mechanism from which you arrived at any decisions regarding this matter. I appreciate a cross-referencing for the requirement of an Administrative Record with SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act), the Clean Water Act, and others. I, as a member of the Restoration Advisory Board, feel this is my citizen responsibility to enlist our oversight in this serious matter via legal advice available to you. I, in turn, will follow up with the Federal Environmental Protection Agency and the Secretary of Defense representatives. Please include this request in your agency administrative record for Camp Bonneville. I thank you, in advance, for your immediate attention. Respectfully, Karen Kingston Camp Bonneville Restoration Advisory Board Co-Chair 22517 N.E. 88th street Vancouver, WA 98682 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] The ESTCP Annual Solicitation for FY 2004 has been released Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Navy Identifies Vieques Alternatives | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] The ESTCP Annual Solicitation for FY 2004 has been released Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Navy Identifies Vieques Alternatives |