From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 29 Jan 2003 19:04:56 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Arkansas: Guard widow's claim |
The following was posted by Andy Pearson <apkthv@hotmail.com> ______________________ Hello Lenny, I don't know if you remember, I called you on that story about an Arkansas National Guard soldier--Michael Gibson--who may have run over a Chemical Agent Identification Set (CAIS) at annual training in 1998 at Ft. Chaffee, Arkansas. The reporter (in the story below) is incorrect in this story in saying that this was a "poison canister." That has never been confirmed although, as I told you in November our experts said the his injuries and death were consistent with exposure to mustard gas and chloropicrin; both agents used in CAIS. As you might recall, there was never an autopsy done on 1Sgt. Gibson. In the words of the attorney for the widow, the Arkansas National Guard (ARNG) has pulled out all stops to get this thing overruled. One of the main arguments of the Senator quoted in this article (Dave Bisbee, a former marine) is of the danger of precedent. He says there have never been any cases of a soldier winning a claim against the Guard or any other military department for injury during annual training and that military personnel give up all rights when they join--whether they're killed on the battlefield or inhale chemical weapons during routine training, as this man may have done. I was wondering if you could post this to your site in the hopes that anyone out there could either refute the claim and cite examples, or agree with it. It bears noting that the Guard denied In Line of Duty benefits to this soldier and his widow and son even though he was on duty at the time. Also, if any on your board have heard of any other CAIS exposures, they can email me at: apkthv@hotmail.com. As we talked about last year, the DOD confirms there are more than 90-thousand CAIS that are unaccounted for. Sincerely, Andy Pearson KTHV-TV Little Rock Widow's Award Struck; To Get Another Look Wed, Jan 29, 2003 By David Robinson Arkansas News Bureau LITTLE ROCK — A $500,000 award to an Arkansas National Guardsman's widow will get another hearing by lawmakers who were warned Tuesday that the award sets a bad precedent. "If we open the door to the military paying claims for wrongful death or injury, there's absolutely no end to that," said Sen. David Bisbee, R-Rogers, co-chairman of the legislative Joint Budget Committee. At issue, Bisbee and others say, is whether the claim should have ever been filed before the state Claims Commission and ultimately appealed to the legislative Claims Review Subcommittee. It should have been filed before the state Workers' Compensation Commission, he said. Bisbee said the jurisdictional issue came up in recent weeks and he believes the claims subcommittee should give it a thorough hearing. He said the Arkansas National Guard has never paid such a claim. Sen. Jerry Bookout, D-Jonesboro, said lawmakers need to be careful on the issue, especially considering that thousands of Arkansas soldiers may now be headed to war. ... for the entire story, see http://www.arkansasnews.com/279904466782655.bsp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] U.S. reduces standard for perchlorate hazard Next by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Woolwich hopes to speed base cleanup | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] U.S. reduces standard for perchlorate hazard Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Perchlorate witnesses reject blame |