From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 4 Feb 2003 15:12:56 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] ITRC released a variety of products in 2002 |
For Immediate Release Contact: Roseanne Black, (540) 557-6101, Roseanne_black@wpi.org ITRC released a variety of products in 2002 The Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC) created a variety of products in 2002 to help state regulators, federal agencies, consulting firms, and stakeholders understand and more effectively deploy innovative environmental technologies. These products included a regulatory overview of technologies for treating dense, nonaqueous-phase liquid source zones; case studies of radioactively contaminated Department of Energy sites; technical and regulatory guidance for using in situ bioremediation; and a CD of diffusion sampler resources. In DNAPL Source Reduction: Facing the Challenge (DNAPLs-2), the Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPLs) Team of ITRC examines the current regulatory climate for deploying technologies to efficiently treat DNAPL source zones. The report outlines the pros and cons of partial source removal and challenges assumptions about the infeasibility of removing DNAPLs from certain geological settings where recent advances have made significant source reduction more feasible and cost-effective. The report acknowledges the technical difficulties and uncertainties surrounding DNAPL source zone reduction and supports further research to study the impacts of reduced source zone mass on groundwater quality and risk to human health and the environment. Determining Cleanup Goals at Radioactively Contaminated Sites: Case Studies (RAD-2) was written to facilitate accelerated closure at our nation’s nuclear weapons production sites by enhancing consistency and streamlining decision making. Produced by ITRC’s Radionuclides Team, the document discusses the requirements of federal regulations and agencies, explains variations in risk assessment approaches, and examines the development of cleanup levels at a dozen radioactively contaminated Department of Energy sites. Each case study has information about the site’s background, history and the nature of contamination, remedial actions that have occurred, and contact information. Common elements in the case studies are applicable regulations, risk assessment approaches and calculations, and cleanup levels used or proposed. Determining Cleanup Goals facilitates a common understanding among states, stakeholders, sites, and agencies of how various cleanup levels have been and could be derived, making the process more efficient, defensible, and consistent. The Radionuclides Team believes that consistency in developing cleanup goals will encourage selection and deployment of appropriate environmental characterization and remediation technologies. A Systematic Approach to In Situ Bioremediation in Groundwater (ISB-8) includes a decision tree that defines parameters and criteria for the feasible and effective implementation of in situ bioremediation (ISB) in general and also includes separate modules for using ISB to biologically treat nitrate, carbon tetrachloride, and perchlorate contamination. The In Situ Bioremediation Team of ITRC developed this technical and regulatory guidance to demonstrate that this systematic approach can be applied to any specific contaminant or site for enhancing decisions about using ISB. The decision trees, or flow diagrams, in the document help site decision makers systematically examine site parameters and criteria for the effective characterization, testing, design, and monitoring of ISB technologies. While the contaminants and breakdown products at contaminated groundwater sites may differ, there are some general site characteristics for determining the efficacy of ISB. The document presents the primary decision points for determining if natural processes can be effective in achieving remediation goals in a reasonable time frame or if engineered approaches should be implemented to accelerate bioremediation. The decision trees in the document point to sections of the document having more detailed information on specific elements. While ITRC products have traditionally been documents and training courses, in 2002 the organization debuted its first CD as a means of disseminating information on an innovative technology. The Diffusion Samplers Team took this momentous step with the production and release of the ITRC Diffusion Sampler Resource CD, which contains nearly 70 articles and presentations on various diffusion samplers, as well as an ITRC training video and an Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence field sampling video. In 2003, 15 ITRC technical teams are producing guidance documents and conducting training on the deployment of innovative environmental technologies. ITRC technical teams have produced more than 40 guidance documents, all of which are available online at the ITRC Web site at www.itrcweb.org. Click on “Guidance Documents” and select from the topical list to download a wide variety of ITRC guidance documents. To obtain a copy of the diffusion sampler CD, e-mail your request to itrc@wpi.org or call (540) 557-6071. ITRC is a state-led group that works to overcome regulatory barriers to the deployment of innovative environmental technologies. ITRC participants come from the ranks of state regulatory agencies, federal agencies concerned with environmental cleanup, environmental consulting firms, and technology vendors. These diverse ITRC participants work together in technical teams to develop documents and training to help regulators develop a consistent and streamlined approach for regulating innovative technologies. ITRC products also help environmental consultants improve the way innovative technologies are deployed. The ITRC Board of Directors is chaired by G. Ken Taylor (taylorgk@dhec.state.sc.us), director of the Hydrogeology Division of South Carolina’s Bureau of Land and Waste Management. # # # # # ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] MMPA Letter to Federal Agencies Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] PRESS RELEASE: Physician Warns Burning Buildingsis Health Risk | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] MMPA Letter to Federal Agencies Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] PRESS RELEASE: Physician Warns Burning Buildingsis Health Risk |