From: | loc@icx.net |
Date: | 11 Feb 2003 17:02:07 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RE: [CPEO-MEF] Scientists say tungsten a promising clue to leukemia cluster |
It's always worthwhile to delve into the facts about a substance when attempting to evaluate news reports such as the one that began this thread. I had a look at the Material Safety Data Sheet for tungsten from the following website: http://www.hummelcroton.com/w_m.html. - Acute Health & Toxic Effects - Irritating to the skin and eyes on contact. Inhalation will cause irritation to the lungs and mucus membrane. Irritation to the eyes will cause watering and redness. Reddening, scaling, and itching are characteristics of skin inflammation. Follow safe industrial hygiene practices and always wear protective equipment when handling this compound. - Chronic Health & Toxic Effects: This product has no known chronic effects. Repeated or prolong exposure to this compound is not known to aggravate medical conditions. - Carcinogenicity: This product is not listed by NTP, IARC or regulated as a Carcinogen by OSHA. - Routes of Exposure: Eye contact. Ingestion. Inhalation. Skin contact. - Toxicity Data: Ipr-Rat LD50: 5 gm/kg [ipr=intraperitoneal, LD50 is the dose required to cause 50% of the rats to die] Since tungsten has never been linked to cancer, it's unlikely to be the cause of a leukemia cluster. The original article also mentioned arsenic, which is a known carcinogen, but not known to cause leukemia. Remember "cancer" is a host of different diseases with different causes (some genetic, some viral, and some environmental). The usual explanation for cancer clusters is random chance--some areas are going to be higher than average and some areas lower, because that's the nature of statistical distribution. This doesn't mean that authorities shouldn't investigate clusters of cancers that can be caused by the same agent, but the results are typically indeterminate. Regarding the weapons issue mentioned by Tom Magness: Some interesting comparisons: Density of tungsten silicide 9.4 g/cc Density of lead 11.3 g/cc Density of uranium 19 g/cc Recall that momentum (an important component of penetrating power) equals mass times velocity. Now, what weapon do you want your child/sibling/spouse/parent/neighbor to have in his or her arsenal as a tank-stopper? War will be an environmental disaster, no matter what metal we use in our ammunition. It's foolish to risk lives of our military personnel and outcomes of battles over worries of future contamination, especially when there are no proved cause-and-effect links of depleted uranium to Gulf War Syndrome or health effects in the battlefield areas (there are many different toxic substances released during battle). It's better to effectively remove the need for warfare through appropriate foreign policy and diplomatic efforts, but when you go in to fight, fight to win. The opinions expressed are my own. Susan Gawarecki -- ..................................................... Susan L. Gawarecki, Ph.D., Executive Director Oak Ridge Reservation Local Oversight Committee 102 Robertsville Road, Suite B, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 Toll free 888-770-3073 ~ www.local-oversight.org ..................................................... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Above the law Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Army's plan to leave uranium in place at JPG | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Scientists say tungsten a promising clue to leukemia cluster Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Scientists say tungsten a promising clue to leukemia cluster |