From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 21 Feb 2003 15:37:50 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RE: [CPEO-MEF] California cuts oversight |
The following response is from Saul Bloom <saulbloom@mindspring.com> ________________________________________________________ Arc Ecology wanted to express its appreciation to Congressman Farr for his work on this issue. The message below however needs some response as it is generally inaccurate and presents a misleading picture regarding the funding for military cleanup in California. It is inaccurate to say that the Defense Department has been steadily funding base cleanup in California up to now. If anything is true it is that DoD funding is inconsistent at best. Arc Ecology has been involved in military pollution/ environmental impacts issues for almost 20 years. All of the base cleanups Arc Ecology is involved in here in California have been subjected to multiple funding disruptions. In some cases it was because a war or some combat activity had gobbled up the funds. In other cases it was a result of a Base Environmental Coordinator failing to obligate the allocated funds to projects before other insallation cleanup coordinators learned of it and had walked off with some of the funds. In some instances it was because DoD itself decided it was spending too much money of a remedial action and simply walked off the job. Arc sued the Navy over such a breach in 1998. In instances where the site is on the NPL, the State's ability to move the process forward was limited. It is also true that almost every year, for the majority of the last eight years, DoD has cut the State's DSMOA funds - sometimes by as much as 20%. This is despite the fact that California has twice the number of military bases as the next most impacted State. In the past, these cuts in funds were supplemented with State monies (creating a defacto additional federal tax on California tax payers), however as the State's defecit grew as a result of the fraud over energy cost, and the national recession it has become increasingly difficult to make up the difference. Simply because cuts in education funding occur during a recession doesn't necesserily imply that the State values its kids less. Difficult times often require unfortunate responses. DoD frequently complained that it was cutting California's DSMOA funds because the State would use it to pay multiple agencies to come to meetings, review documents etc. which was driving up the costs. Arc Ecology's own observations (and have attended numerous base cleanup meetings) presents a very different picture. Our experience indicates that this was rarely the case. Different State Agencies have different expertice which were appropriate to the phase of cleanup decision-making. More often than not there would be one or two State regulators at these meetings who would be confronted by a passel of DoD environmental personnel and contractors. Certainly money poured, but in our experience it wasn't California doing most of the spilling. In fact quite the opposite is actually occuring. DoD continues to pour money into poor contracting practices and incompetent base environmental management while at the same time raiding State tax rolls to supplement its own budget which is inadequate to meet the requirements of a timley cleanup - by design. Finally, I would simply point out that from Camp Beale in Northern California, to the Sierra Army Depot on the border with Nevada, to Hunters Point in San Francisco to Fort Ord in Monterey and Camp Pendleton in Southern California, residents of this State regularly confront and pay a steep price for the health and environmental consequences of DoD's irresponsible base cleanup programs. Millions of Californian's drink perclorate tainted water from the military's pollution of the Colorado river. Given that we are the most populous state in the Union with extremely high densities of urban populations colocated with active, closing, closed, and formerly utilized military facilities, if scientifically meaningful and impartial risk based analysis were ever truly used in the base cleanup process: California's portion of the annual DSMOA funds would surely and dramatically increase. Saul Bloom Arc Ecology ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Rand Study: $50 mil Needed for Landmine Removal in 90 Nations Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] PCB report kicks off controversy | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] California cuts oversight Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Trash dump from 1940s is unearthed by workers |