From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 13 Mar 2003 17:37:08 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] The military and the greens |
Milwaukee, WI Editorial: The military and the greens _From the Journal Sentinel Last Updated: March 12, 2003 Detail should be important to everyone in the military. Making sure soldiers have enough bullets (or airmen enough missiles or sailors enough shells) can obviously mean the difference between life and death, victory and defeat. "For want of a nail" and all that. So when Defense Department officials testify today on exemptions they want from the nation's environmental laws, they can best make their case by presenting detailed evidence of how those laws impinge on national security and the military's ability to train its men and women. Because right now, that evidence seems to be missing. As we noted in January, there do seem to be individual cases in which training is altered and becomes unrealistic because of environmental rules. But in such cases, commanders already have the ability to ask the president to grant exemptions. The curious thing is that while Presidents Clinton and Bush both granted exemptions to prevent the release of classified information, no president has received a request for an exemption based on military readiness concerns, according to testimony last year before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. If environmental laws do pose problems for training, why have no commanders ever sought an exemption on that basis? This editorial can be viewed at: http://www.jsonline.com/news/editorials/mar03/124833.asp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] War against environment? Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Open Burning Plan Does Not Safeguard Human Health and the Environment | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] War against environment? Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Open Burning Plan Does Not Safeguard Human Health and the Environment |