From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 14 Mar 2003 15:09:50 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] State to Army: Arsenal cleanup inadequate |
California State to Army: Arsenal cleanup inadequate By Rob Shea Staff writer BENICIA - State health officials are questioning the quality of the U.S. Army Corp of Engineer's effort to clean up Benicia's former Arsenal properties, and want to apply higher standards for detection and removal of potentially dangerous or hazardous materials A letter sent by an official at the California Department of Toxic Substances Control in January also accuses the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers of prematurely calling the project done and it complains that Caltrans, in building the new Benicia Bridge, buried an area that contained a tank and other weapons materials before it was fully cleaned up. It also demands answers to the possibility that a Benicia Arsenal worker once kicked a cylinder of leaking mustard gas into the Carquinez Strait. The letter, sent to the Army Corps, appears to include various areas of the 2,700-acre cleanup area of the former arsenal, even some that have been considered finished. Its content and tone mark an abrupt turn in a relationship that has been hailed as a model of cooperation. The two agencies are scheduled to meet to discuss their differences later this month, said the Army Corps' senior program manager Jerry Vincent, to whom the DTSC letter was addressed. The Corps will answer the state's concerns at a March 19 meeting of the Arsenal Restoration Advisory Board in Benicia, he said. Signed by Donn Diebert, who oversees the cleanup of former military sites for DTSC, the letter asserts that there has been "inadequate investigation and removal of (ordnance and explosives) performed by (the Army Corps of Engineers)." It suggests particular concern about land adjacent to the planned 420-home Tourtelot housing project planned by Granite Management Corp. However, the land on which the homes are to be built, is not a target of the dispute. The state and Army are partners in the cleanup of military ordnance and explosives (OE), along with the city of Benicia and some private land owners. Since a Granite contractor discovered non-explosive ordnance while moving soil for new home construction on the Tourtelot property in 1996, crews hired by the Army have used metal detectors to search for metal or other "anomalies" in areas from that residential area to city's historic Camel Barns. "There are indications that there are anomalies and they haven't fully investigated what those anomalies are," said Ron Baker, a DTSC spokesman. "They've had a number of things bounce back (during metal detection) and they haven't fully investigated what's bouncing back." Diebert's letter also said Michael Mitchener, the Army Corp's project manager for the cleanup, created confusion when he said at a March 2002 public meeting of the board charged with overseeing the cleanup that the Army was "not walkin' away from any site until it meets the regulatory requirements" because he was aware that DTSC had challenged the cleanup standards. Since then the Army also stated in a January newsletter that the "cleanup effort to remove OE is complete," further angering state officials. The newsletter is sent to about 9,000 Benicia residences. This article can be viewed at: http://www.benicianews.com/articles/index.cfm?artOID=28668&webpage=0&s=1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Pediatrician Offers Comments on Badger Burning Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] EPA clean-up role at fort has changed | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Pediatrician Offers Comments on Badger Burning Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] EPA clean-up role at fort has changed |