From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 19 Mar 2003 20:19:47 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Military Seeks an Exemption of Its Own |
California Military Seeks an Exemption of Its Own Bases want to be excused from compliance with environmental laws. By Julie Cart, Times Staff Writer Saying military readiness is at stake, the Pentagon is asking Congress to exempt military installations, including several in California, from environmental laws protecting marine mammals and endangered species and requiring the cleanup of potentially toxic weapons sites. The Readiness and Range Preservation Initiative, sponsored by the White House, seeks exemptions from several environmental laws: * A section of the Endangered Species Act that protects wildlife habitat. * Sections of the Marine Mammal Protection Act that prohibit harassment of whales, dolphins, manatees and other sea mammals. * Part of the Superfund statute that covers cleanups of explosives and munitions. * Clean Air Act requirements for military vehicles during training. * Hazardous waste laws that prohibit exposed toxic substances and require paying damages to states in cases of contamination. The Defense Department presented its case during hearings on Capitol Hill last week, outlining its request that branches of the service be given the flexibility to operate outside the restrictions of environmental laws, which the military says hamper training and preparedness. The initiative is being considered by committees in the House and Senate. The California military installations most affected are Camp Pendleton, Ft. Irwin, Edwards Air Force Base, China Lake Naval Weapons Center, the Twentynine Palms Marine base and, east of the Salton Sea, the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range. This article can be viewed at: http://www.latimes.com/la-war-exempt19mar19,0,229577.story ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Gallegly proposes shift in spending Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] $90 Million Club Congressional District Maps | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Gallegly proposes shift in spending Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] $90 Million Club Congressional District Maps |