From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 28 Apr 2003 17:15:40 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] EPA Bans Staff From Discussing Issue of Perchlorate Pollution |
The Environmental Working Group's (EWG's) report on the contaminated lettuce, "Suspect Salads," can be viewed at: http://www.ewg.org/reports/suspectsalads/ _________________________________ EPA Bans Staff From Discussing Issue of Perchlorate Pollution By: Peter Waldman The Wall Street Journal April 28, 2003 The Bush administration has imposed a gag order on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency from publicly discussing perchlorate pollution, even as two new studies reveal high levels of the rocket-fuel component may be contaminating the nation's lettuce supply. The lettuce studies, one published Monday by a nonprofit environmental group and one in final preparation by an EPA laboratory in Athens, Ga., address a crucial question in the current process of developing a federal drinking-water standard for perchlorate: whether Americans are ingesting the chemical from food sources in addition to drinking water. The answer, according to both studies, strongly suggests they are, which means that any eventual drinking-water standard will have to be that much stricter to account for the other sources of perchlorate exposure. Perchlorate pollution in drinking water has become a major concern in some 20 states across the country, after an EPA recommendation last year that found perchlorate in drinking water poses dangers to human health, particularly to infant development, in concentrations above one part per billion. The Pentagon and several defense contractors, who face billions of dollars in potential cleanup liability for perchlorate pollution, vehemently oppose that EPA health-risk assessment, arguing perchlorate is safe in drinking water at levels 70 to 200 times higher than what the EPA says is safe. In January, U.S. Sen. James Inhofe, (R., Okla.) chairman of the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee, weighed in on the industry's side with a long list of questions and criticisms of the EPA's report. The White House recently proposed a bill in Congress, in the name of military "readiness," that would effectively exempt the Pentagon and defense industry from much of their potential liability for perchlorate cleanup. This article can be viewed at: http://www.ewg.org/news/story.php?id=1636 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Comments on EPA's Draft IC Guidance Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] GAO Report on Former Defense Sites Cleanup Coordination | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Generals Fight the Last War Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] GAO Report on Former Defense Sites Cleanup Coordination |