From: | dickboyd@aol.com |
Date: | 27 May 2003 14:06:03 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RE: [CPEO-MEF] FW: Official MSDS for Ammonium Perchlorate |
Thank you for the 1996 MSDS on ammonium perchlorate (AP) from Hummel Croton, Inc. (HCI) Perhaps a review of 29 CFR OSHA communications procedures within DoD is required? The MSDS forwarded for ammonium perchlorate is dated. Based on the lack of disclosure, downstream users have no reporting requirements. Minimum spill reporting is not even mentioned. The user is required to conduct his own research on state and local requirements. California Prop 65 comment is that to the manufacturer's 1996 knowledge, there is no carcinogenic effect. Does Thiokol or the activity that actually blends propellants for NASA and DoD have an MSDS for the next step in the use of AP? Is HCL that large of a producer of AP in comparison to Kerr-McGee or others? Suppliers of AP to DoD seem to include disclaimers holding themselves free of fault in how DoD uses the material. My original question was on the perchlorate ion itself. There are other materials beside ammonium perchlorate that contain perchlorate ions. Going upstream in the manufacturing process, what do the other perchlorate chemicals call for on their MSDS? Going downstream, is there anything added in the process that would call for additional scrutiny? For example if blended with aluminum powder or binders, or milled to a finer grain size? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Passing On Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Critical Habitat on Camp Pendleton | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Passing On Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Ft. Detrick Unearths Hazardous Surprises |