From: | uxogypfy@bellsouth.net |
Date: | 27 May 2003 14:06:19 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] Critical Habitat on Camp Pendleton |
Camp Pendleton was dedicated as a Marine Base in 1942. I would assume it was there when San Onofre was built, I believe in the 60's. I remember seeing it in it's construction phases as my Dad took me on drives along PCH. Stella ----- Original Message ----- From: <petestrauss1@attbi.com> To: "cpeo-military" <cpeo-military@igc.topica.com> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 3:54 PM Subject: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Critical Habitat on Camp Pendleton > Thanks for providing this map, Aimee. Based on this, I am at loss to > understand DoD's complaints. I also assume that many of the civilian > workforce for Camp Pendelton live in some of the urban encroachment areas. > Would the Marines be able to recruit a civilian workforce if not for these > communities? > > It's also interesting that you do not hear complaints from DoD about > Southern California Edison's three nuclear reactors at the San Onofre site. > Does DoD look the other way when large commercial interests are involved, > but complains about setting aside habitat for endangered species? > > Does someone know if San Onofre State Park was present when Camp Pendelton > was established? > > Peter Strauss > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Aimee Houghton" <aimeeh@cpeo.org> > To: <cpeo-military@igc.topica.com> > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 9:07 AM > Subject: [CPEO-MEF] Critical Habitat on Camp Pendleton > > > > Over the months there have been many discussions about the encroachments > > problems facing Camp Pendleton. Much of the debate has been centered > > around the amount of critical habitat that has been designated on this > > site. DOD has testified before Congress that 57% of land at Camp > Pendleton > > had been designated critical habitat. Actually 57% had been proposed. > The > > link below directs you to a map based upon Fish and Wildlife data showing > > the actual critical habitat designations to date. > > > > You will also notice other encroachments such as a nuclear power plant, an > > interstate highway, and dense development. > > > > http://www.cpeo.org/pubs/camp_pend.jpg > > > > Aimee > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Aimee R. Houghton > > Associate Director, CPEO > > 1101 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 1000 > > Washington, DC 20036 > > tel: 202-452-8039; fax: 202-452-8095 > > Email: aimeeh@cpeo.org > > www.cpeo.org > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at > > > > http://www.cpeo.org/newsgrp.html > > > > If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, > please send a blank message with no subject to: > > > > cpeo-military-subscribe@igc.topica.com > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at > > http://www.cpeo.org/newsgrp.html > > If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a blank message with no subject to: > > cpeo-military-subscribe@igc.topica.com > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] FW: Official MSDS for Ammonium Perchlorate Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Ft. Detrick Unearths Hazardous Surprises | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Critical Habitat on Camp Pendleton Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] The Inhofe Amendment: Still Unacceptable |