From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 18 Jun 2003 20:26:02 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] Bechtel venture is picked to destroy depot's weapons |
The following was posted by Arlen Crabb <ajcrabb@bellatlantic.net> ____________________________________________________ I am amazed the amount of time it will take to destroy the chemical weapons at Blue Grass Army Depot. Here at Aberdeen Proving Grounds in 2000 they were building a plant to "neutralize" the mustard agent here. The original plan called for the total "neutralization" process to take until 2006 to destroy all of the agent. But then along came September 11, 2001 and suddenly they are going to destroy all the mustard agent by the end of 2002. The plant was redesigned and operating procedures were changed. In May 2003 the first one ton container was opened and the destruction of mustard agent was under way. Currently they are projecting to have "neutralized" the mustard agent by the end of 2003. My question is this. If they accelerated the "neutralization" here at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, why not at Blue Grass? And why design a new "plant" when a working plant is already in use? The terror threat that stepped up the "neutralization" at Aberdeen is still present, if you listen to the nighty news, so why a decade to complete the process? But that is just my view. Arlen Crabb Aberdeen Proving Grounds Restoration Advisory Board. Aberdeen Proving Grounds Superfund Citizen Coalition. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Sonar puts whales at greater risk Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] United Kingdom Joins Arctic Environmental Cooperation | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Bechtel venture is picked to destroy depot's weapons Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Hill Air Force Base Not Affecting Roy Water |