From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 25 Aug 2003 16:18:35 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Development benefits questioned |
Please Note: The following link may expire prematurely. If there are any problems accessing this article online, please contact cpeo@cpeo.org. ___________________________________ California MERCURY NEWS Development benefits questioned Labor Wants Community Input By Michelle Guido Posted on Tue, Aug. 19, 2003 Labor groups want San Jose to become the first city in California to radically change the way it handles redevelopment agency projects that receive a large share of tax dollars. In a report released today, Working Partnerships USA and the South Bay labor council call on the city to scrutinize large projects by evaluating what the community stands to gain before the city puts up any money. The push for ``community benefits'' -- such as low-income housing, child care and jobs that pay above minimum wage -- is not new. But the plea from labor unions for a formal policy comes at a time when the San Jose Redevelopment Agency is faced with slashing its roughly $500 million capital budget by as much as $40 million. In the past 25 years, the redevelopment agency has spent more than $2.3 billion on projects for which the city received only token community feedback, the report stated. Proponents of the policy say more public participation at the front end of large-scale publicly subsidized projects can lead to better jobs and more affordable housing. ``We're saying the redevelopment agency and the developers shouldn't be the only people at the table,'' said Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins, executive officer of the South Bay AFL-CIO Labor Council. ``There should be a more accountable process where more people are involved.'' But critics say any obstacles placed before developers, especially in lean times, will drive them away from doing business in San Jose. ``Our concern is: Does it attract investments and jobs to San Jose, or does it send a signal to potential investors that maybe they should go to Sunnyvale or somewhere else?'' said Jim Cunneen, president and chief executive of the San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce. This article can be viewed at: http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/6566342.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Military Pitfalls Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] SHARED INCLUSION AND PROSPERITY Report | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Military Pitfalls Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] SHARED INCLUSION AND PROSPERITY Report |