From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 26 Aug 2003 15:33:14 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Destroying Chemical Weapons |
C&EN WASHINGTON Destroying Chemical Weapons Army's problem-plagued program more costly than originally planned Lois R. Ember August 26, 2003 The Army's program to destroy the nation's arsenal of chemical weapons as mandated by the Chemical Weapons Convention is way over budget and far behind schedule. Persistent, pesky problems at operating disposal sites offer little to encourage hope for better performance. Originally, the Army's price tag for the destruction program was pegged at $1.8 billion. That was in 1985. In 2001, the Pentagon's estimate had spiraled to $24 billion. In the 1980s, the Army confidently envisioned eliminating the weapons by 1994. Today, it's likely the U.S. will have to ask the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons--the treaty's oversight agency--for a five-year extension of the 2007 disposal deadline. Greg Mahall, spokesman for the Army's Chemical Materials Agency, admits that "earlier projections were overly optimistic and maybe not based in reality." But, he adds, "it's a complex and challenging program." In 1982, the Army selected incineration as its destruction technology, which to date has destroyed 26% of the 31,500 tons of chemical agents in the U.S. stockpile. Craig Williams, who directs the Chemical Weapons Working Group, which opposes incineration, says, "There's no question that the technology selected has, in significant part, been responsible for the cost overruns and the time slippage." He also believes that it will be a "challenge" for the U.S. to meet even the 2012 deadline. He may have a point if the experience at the Tooele, Utah, incineration facility is any guide. Tooele--which originally stored 43% of the nation's chemical weapons--has destroyed 44% of its holdings over the past seven years. But not without glitches and delays. Though original projections set 2004 as the date for complete elimination of its weapons, Tooele will probably not meet that goal until the end of 2007, fully 11 years after operations began. This article can be viewed at: http://pubs.acs.org/cen/today/august262003.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] IAAP cleanup pace in dispute Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Federal Court Restricts Global Deployment of Navy Sonar | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] IAAP cleanup pace in dispute Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Federal Court Restricts Global Deployment of Navy Sonar |