From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 12 Sep 2003 14:33:04 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Test tomato crop free of perchlorate |
California THE GILROY DISPATCH Test tomato crop free of perchlorate By Carol Holzgrafe Thursday, September 11, 2003 SAN MARTIN - The results are in and Bob Cerruti’s tomatoes don’t show signs of harboring perchlorate, at least above 50 parts per billion. What the test does show, Cerruti said, is that tomatoes don’t appear to concentrate the chemical as does lettuce. “There could very well be some perchlorate in these tomatoes. But at this current stage of technology, they can’t detect it,” Cerruti said. The testing technology used by the local lab, Sequoia Analytical, is only able to find levels at 50 ppb and above. State and federal regulatory levels, once set, could range between 1 and 6 ppb, making some agricultural leaders question the usefulness of the backyard experiment. “You don’t know what a crop’s uptake is until you do an analysis,” Cerruti said. “What I do know is that there is no rapid accumulation of perchlorate in these tomatoes.” Cerruti, a San Martin resident, decided to have his homegrown tomatoes tested because a recent study in Texas showed outer lettuce leaves tend to concentrate perchlorate up to 60 times the amount of the toxin that is in the irrigation water, and he wondered if his tomatoes reacted the same way. So, Cerruti planted his tomatoes in two sections, watering one part with well water and the other with bottled water and measuring water and fertilizer. In recent weeks, experiments like Cerruti’s have been the target of concern by politicians, farming advocates and some local growers and residents. They worried that if Cerruti’s test showed that tomatoes accumulated perchlorate like lettuce, the news could cause a reaction from buyers of all types of produce that could wipe out Santa Clara County agriculture. “The news is encouraging, however I’d be saying the same thing whether the results were good or bad: the testing methodology is faulty because labs can’t guarantee more than 50 percent accuracy, so there is still a lot of work that needs to be done,” said Jenny Midtgaard Derry, executive director for the Farm Bureau. Ag officials like Derry are pressing for government funded scientific experiments on all produce crops. They are inviting all elected county, state and federal officials to a perchlorate working group meeting later this month to lobby for more testing and a so-called risk assessment level so farmers know what level of perchlorate in their food is too much to be considered safe. “We have a tight concentration of public will to get this done, we’re trying to get politicians to buy in and help us,” Derry said. This article can be viewed at: http://gilroydispatch.com/news/newsview.asp?c=73723 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Ghost ships may start long ocean tow today Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Experts say Ord burns no worse than big fire | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Ghost ships may start long ocean tow today Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Pollution from Anniston Army Depot impacts catfish business |