From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 26 Oct 2003 20:14:56 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] "Pentagon, environmentalists battle..." |
Pentagon, environmentalists battle over species protection MILITARY BASES HAVE BECOME LAST REFUGES By Andrew Bridges Associated Press (in San Jose Mercury News Sunday, October 26, 2003 CAMP PENDLETON - Since this sprawling base was carved out of a cattle ranch at the onset of World War II, Marines have stormed an unassuming stretch of beach here countless times to train for battles from Iwo Jima to An-Nasiriyah. The Marines have subjected Red Beach, as the 1,500-yard piece of Southern California sand is known, to punishing treatment in mock exercises designed to prepare them for combat. Now the Defense Department is doing battle over Red Beach itself, part of a larger war the Pentagon is waging in Congress over the nation's more than 425 military installations, the largest of which dot states throughout the West -- from the 2 million acres of the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico to the 870,000 acres of Fort Wainwright in Alaska. The Pentagon fears that much of that land, originally set aside for its exclusive use, could be snatched away from it by the Endangered Species Act and other environmental laws that address everything from porpoises to pollution. At stake, it argues, is the U.S. military's very ability to train in peace as it fights in war. To counter the perceived threat of laws such as the Superfund and Clean Air Act, the Pentagon is pushing for exemptions. ``Use of the terrain is absolutely essential and is at the heart of our training,'' said John Walsh, a special assistant in the Pentagon office of the deputy undersecretary of defense for readiness. ``Those pieces of terrain can't be reserved for the fostering of endangered species.'' Environmentalists vehemently oppose the initiative and call it an unwarranted rollback of the nation's key environmental laws. They fear other agencies could follow the Pentagon's lead and seek similar exemptions, leading to an overall weakening of the laws. ``Essentially, it's an administrative and legislative strategy to exempt them from key environmental laws that every American and every other agency has to comply with,'' said Susan Holmes, senior legislative representative for the environmental group Earthjustice. The dispute comes at a time when military installations stand as rare islands on the land that represent some of the best, if not last, habitat for many of the nation's rarest species. ... for the entire story, see http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/7107831.htm -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Ft. Ord fire update Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Advisories RAB to Installation | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Ft. Ord fire update Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Advisories RAB to Installation |