From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 5 Dec 2003 17:28:26 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Thirsty for information |
Nevada LAS VEGAS MERCURY Thirsty for information By Larry Wills Thursday, December 04, 2003 How much perchlorate in the water is safe? The government doesn't know A federal study has confirmed earlier reports that rocket fuel chemicals from Henderson industrial plants are contaminating the nation's food supply. The study by the Department of Agriculture shows that lettuce grown along the lower Colorado River is particularly susceptible, with accumulations of the contaminant perchlorate far above the limit suggested by the Environmental Protection Agency. Just what kind of health hazard that might pose is being debated, since the EPA has yet to rule on what concentrations of perchlorate are safe. Perchlorate has been linked to thyroid and endocrine damage, with pregnant women and children particularly at risk. Levels of perchlorate, a chemical used in rocket fuel by the Defense Department, reached 80 parts per billion in leafy and Romaine lettuce in six of 10 samples gathered for the study. The EPA has been considering the safety level at less than 20 parts per billion. "It's basically leafy greens," Allen Jennings, USDA pest management policy director, says of the contaminated plants. "We're not finding it in carrots and onions. The main objective of our study was to see if other fruits and vegetables had potential levels." But mustard greens, melons and milk have reportedly yielded levels of perchlorate in other studies. Jennings insisted the data from Southern California, which is the nation's largest supplier of winter lettuce, was not alarming. "We're not seeing that ability to accumulate that we saw in samples last year and in March and April," he says. He says contamination levels were about 30 parts per billion, where earlier lettuce tests reached as high as 80 parts per billion. He conceded that perchlorate as a salt cannot be washed off the vegetables, since it ends up in the plant's tissues, but doubted it posed a health threat. "It's still a healthy diet, certainly until we know more." Jennings says the Food and Drug Administration is planning more detailed tests on the crops along the Arizona-California border. That agency also has not imposed permissible limits on perchlorate contamination. "They'll be using more sensitive analytical methods," Jennings says. But that's of little comfort to Eric Wesselman, a California Sierra Club official who's tracked the contamination and who plans to issue a report after the first of the year. "We will provide more information on this subject," he says. "In a few months, we'll find out how bad this situation is. Is it good or bad to have rocket fuel in our bodies? There's a huge need for a federal standard, since this lettuce is being shipped all over the country." Wesselman says he's waiting for the public indignation over the contamination that affects the entire lower reach of the Colorado River. "Public reaction haven't started yet. Someone's going to discover, `My God, there's rocket fuel in the water.' You cook with it, you bathe in it. They'll be amazed to find out no one's doing anything. The drinking water is just as alarming." This article can be viewed at: http://www.lasvegasmercury.com/2003/MERC-Dec-04-Thu-2003/22689498.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Study shows military post does not pose health risk Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Activists want depleted-uranium munitions labeled | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Study shows military post does not pose health risk Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Activists want depleted-uranium munitions labeled |