From: | "Walsh, William" <walshw@pepperlaw.com> |
Date: | 5 Feb 2004 17:11:32 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RE: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized |
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. As I understand it, it is neutralent that is being transported. It is 99.99% or more water and other nonchemical agent material. There are low levels of agent. I think that the Final EIS on the Nonstockpile transportable units summarized a lot of the data on neutralent as well as some of the National Research Council reports (available on line). The Dupont treatment is to reduce the small amount of residual left. Thus, the residual of agent in the truck: (1) are not at levels that are anywhere near the levels in the original weapons; (2) are well below any acute toxic level; (3)are not in the form (gas) that is of concern for the original agent. Any of the 200,000 gasoline trucks or hazardous waste transport trucks on the roads every day present a greater relative risk. William J. Walsh Pepper Hamilton LLP 600 Fourteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Phone: (202) 220 -1424 Fax: (202) 220-1665 e-mail: walshw@pepperlaw.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: Re: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized Next by Date: Re: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized | |
Prev by Thread: RE: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized Next by Thread: Post 9-11 Secrecy Hits Home in Aberdeen Maryland |