From: | Steve Taylor <steve@miltoxproj.org> |
Date: | 5 Feb 2004 16:17:10 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized |
Interesting point and leads very directly to an argument in favor of use reducation of toxic chemicals rather than emissions control, treatment, and disposal....But that's a discussion for another list. More to the point, most of the hazardous susbstances transported by road and rail are on the way to some end location at which they will be used in production or sold and used by consumers. The nerve gas secondary waste in question could in fact be treated by the Army safely on-site in Indiana without transporting it and creating any additional danger associated with the transport. Steve Taylor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Susan L Gawarecki" <loc@icx.net> To: "CPEO" <cpeo-military@igc.topica.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 11:38 AM Subject: Re: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized > According to DOT regulations, trucks transporting hazardous chemicals, > explosives, and radioactive materials are placarded to reflect the > nature of their load. Emergency responders are trained to interpret the > placards and respond to the situation accordingly. While nerve gas is > rightfully considered a very hazardous cargo, there are plenty of > chemical tankers on the roads every day with loads that are every bit as > dangerous. Chlorine is routinely transported in bulk for use at water > treatment plants and swimming pools. It was once used as a chemical > weapon. Nerve gas at least is designed to degrade quickly when exposed > to the environment so the attacking troops can move in after it's been used. > > The DOT publishes a list of chemicals identified by a numerical > designation on the truck or tank car placard. If you make note of these > on the road, you will be quite amazed at the number and variety of > hazardous materials shipments. The most common of these, of course, is > gasoline. Frankly, I don't see any difference in being killed by a > crash of a truck carrying nerve gas vs. the explosion of a gasoline tanker. > > Susan Gawarecki > > -- > ..................................................... > Susan L. Gawarecki, Ph.D., Executive Director > Oak Ridge Reservation Local Oversight Committee > 102 Robertsville Road, Suite B, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 > Toll free 888-770-3073 ~ www.local-oversight.org > ..................................................... > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our > important work on military and environmental issues will continue. > Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. > http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 > > For archived listserve messages go to: > http://www.cpeo.org/newsgrp.html > > To subscribe please visit us at: > http://www.cpeo.org/sub.html > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: Re: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized Next by Date: RE: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized Next by Thread: Re: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized |