From: | Susan L Gawarecki <loc@icx.net> |
Date: | 5 Feb 2004 14:21:33 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized |
According to DOT regulations, trucks transporting hazardous chemicals,
explosives, and radioactive materials are placarded to reflect the
nature of their load. Emergency responders are trained to interpret the
placards and respond to the situation accordingly. While nerve gas is
rightfully considered a very hazardous cargo, there are plenty of
chemical tankers on the roads every day with loads that are every bit as
dangerous. Chlorine is routinely transported in bulk for use at water
treatment plants and swimming pools. It was once used as a chemical
weapon. Nerve gas at least is designed to degrade quickly when exposed
to the environment so the attacking troops can move in after it's been used. The DOT publishes a list of chemicals identified by a numerical designation on the truck or tank car placard. If you make note of these on the road, you will be quite amazed at the number and variety of hazardous materials shipments. The most common of these, of course, is gasoline. Frankly, I don't see any difference in being killed by a crash of a truck carrying nerve gas vs. the explosion of a gasoline tanker. Susan Gawarecki -- ..................................................... Susan L. Gawarecki, Ph.D., Executive Director Oak Ridge Reservation Local Oversight Committee 102 Robertsville Road, Suite B, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 Toll free 888-770-3073 ~ www.local-oversight.org ..................................................... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: FY2005 Budget Update Next by Date: Re: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized Next by Thread: Re: Moving nerve gas waste is criticized |