From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 14 Apr 2004 03:36:11 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Metropolitan Water District opposes RRPI proposal |
=========================================================== Your opinion counts! We're conducting a survey for a computer service/repair company. When you complete our survey, you will also be entered into a drawing for one of ten $100 prizes. Just click http://click.topica.com/caab6PVaVxieSa8wsBba/ Val Rad =========================================================== Metropolitan Board Opposes Efforts to Exempt Defense Department, Contractors from Environmental Law LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 13, 2004-- MWD board calls on Department of Defense to accept responsibility for remediation, cleanup of perchlorate contamination in water sources Calling it "bad public policy," Metropolitan Water District's board of directors today formally opposed the Department of Defense's current efforts to exempt all military bases and defense contractors from existing federal laws that regulate the release and cleanup of environmental hazards. Metropolitan's board specifically cited perchlorate contamination that has tainted numerous Southern California surface water and groundwater resources and has been linked to Defense Department activities and contractors. "Granting broad exemptions to the Department of Defense would be bad public policy," said Metropolitan board Chairman Phillip J. Pace. "Although the proposed exemptions have not garnered wide support, water agencies throughout the West and the nation are concerned about the precedent they would set if passed by Congress. "While we appreciate the need to allow the Defense Department to do its important work, we need to safeguard water quality. Ultimately, protecting the public is a task we share with the department," Pace said. Sought through the Defense Department's Readiness and Range Preservation Initiative, the proposed exemptions could strip state and federal environmental regulators of any authority to enforce cleanup of certain contaminants, such as perchlorate, until the pollution migrated off military bases. The proposed exemptions from the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 may also effectively prevent litigation against parties, particularly the military, which are responsible for perchlorate and other possible pollutants that have contaminated public drinking water supplies. The Department of Defense's proposal marks the military's latest effort to seek the exemptions. Last year, the Defense Department dropped the same amendments from the National Defense Authorization Act after enormous opposition. "Although the Department of Defense believes the proposed exemptions are necessary to maintain military readiness, there are ways to maintain that readiness without jeopardizing water quality," Metropolitan Chief Executive Officer Ronald R. Gastelum said. "In the end, blanket exemptions and the failure to address contamination that has already escaped would unfairly shift a national financial obligation onto water ratepayers and consumers." The Department of Defense has yet to meet U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein's (D-Calif.) November 2002 request to take responsibility for the perchlorate contamination caused by programs and activities related to the department and its contractors. A chemical used in the manufacture of solid rocket fuel, munitions and fireworks, perchlorate has been detected in more than 300 groundwater wells throughout Southern California, forcing many local district's to shut down wells. Low levels of contamination also have been detected in the region's Colorado River supplies, emanating from a chemical manufacturing facility owned by Kerr-McGee Chemical LLE near Lake Mead in Nevada. Currently, Kerr-McGee, under the direction of the state of Nevada and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, is treating the contaminated water at the site. "Unfortunately, conventional water treatment does not remove perchlorate," Gastelum said. "Metropolitan, however, continues to track and support efforts that reduce perchlorate at the supply source." With its action today, Metropolitan's board joined the Association of California Water Agencies, the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies and the American Water Works Association in opposing the proposed exemptions. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California is a cooperative of 26 cities and water agencies serving 18 million people in six counties. The district imports water from the Colorado River and Northern California to supplement local supplies, and helps its members to develop increased water conservation, recycling, storage and other water-management programs. for a formatted version, see http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20040413005961&newsLang=en -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org =========================================================== $6.95 .com Domain Name Sale! Limited Time! ICANN Accredited GoDaddy! http://click.topica.com/caab7pQaVxieSa8wsBbf/ GoDaddy =========================================================== ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: Re: El Toro Sales to fund Navy BRAC cleanup? Next by Date: Threats to Colorado River Cited | |
Prev by Thread: Los Alamos Groundwater Next by Thread: Threats to Colorado River Cited |