From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 16 Aug 2004 21:13:48 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Ft. Wingate propellant disposal |
Your free subscription is supported by today's sponsor: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Save up to 67% on Omaha Steaks + Get 6 FREE Burgers and a FREE Cutlery Set + Cutting Board! http://click.topica.com/caacvgpaVxieSbnA7rua/OmahaSteaks ------------------------------------------------------------------- On July 29, 2004, the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) sent a letter to the Army and its Ft. Wingate, New Mexico tenant, TPL Inc. (not to be confused with the Trust for Public Land), seeking information pertaining to the disposal of ordnance at the closed Army base. The heart of the letter states: "On April 9-12, 2002, NMED staff members conducted a Compliance Evaluation Inspection of the Facility. During the inspection, HWB [Hazardous Waste Bureau] staff members observed, in addition to a number of violations of the HWA [Hazardous Waste Act] and its implementing regulations, approximately 12 million pounds of propellant and approximately 800 105mm Howitzer practice rounds stored at the Facility. Furthermore, TPL employees informed NMED that TPL had burned or detonated propellant, products containing propellant, and other military munitions at the Facility. Since the inspection, TPL has burned or detonated propellant, products containing propellant, and other military munitions at the Facility and at sites outside the Facility boundaries. "TPL claims that the propellant (including Category C and D propellant) and Howitzer rounds stored at the Facility are not solid waste as defined under 40 CFR [section]266.202 because they can be and are being recycled and are thus exempt from RCRA [Resource Conservation and Recovery Act] regulation. In addition, TPL claims that the burning and/or detonation of propellant, products containing propellant, and/or other military munitions on- and off-site is also exempt from RCRA permit regulations because it is done either to respond to an immediate threat pursuant to 40 CFR [section]270.1(c)(3)(i)(D), to train personnel, or for purposes of research, development and testing. "To date, however, neither TPL nor Army has substantiated, through the submission of appropriate information to NMED, that the storage and alleged recycling of propellant and 105mm Howitzer practice rounds and the burning and/or detonation of propellant, products containing propellant, and other military munitions are exempt activities under RCRA. NMED therefore requests that TPL and Army provide the following information and supporting documentation to NMED ..." -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org Your free subscription is supported by today's sponsor: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Get a Great Credit Card for You Today You can find a credit card to fit your credit needs. All types of credit cards -- 0% APRs, Rewards, & Bad Credit. http://click.topica.com/caacvguaVxieSbnA7ruf/411Web ------------------------------------------------------------------- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: Re: Trabuco Range debate (4th of 4 messages) Next by Date: Amchitka radiation | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Trabuco Range debate (4th of 4 messages) Next by Thread: Ft. Wingate Propellant Disposal |