From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 30 Sep 2004 23:07:40 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] rocket fuel recycling troubles |
The report, from Westford, Massachusetts, that commercial blasting for either highway construction or quarrying may be responsible for local perchlorate contamination, is particularly troubling. Instead of shifting the responsibility for perchlorate pollution from the military and aerospace industry, it suggests that what has been a promising solution to that problem may simply shift the hazard elsewhere. For fourteen years I have supported the recycling of solid rocket fuel. I have repeatedly praised the armed services' development and deployment of systems that remove waste rocket fuel, treat it, and make it available for reuse. Other industries, such as mining and construction, can use propellant that doesn't make the grade necessary for launching rockets and missiles. Systems to deal with old, scrap, or otherwise unusable rocket fuel are essential. In 2001, the Army reported, "The 80 million pounds of ammonium perchlorate oxidizer that can be recovered from obsolete missile propellants may be recycled back into new military munitions or converted into various industrial products ..." By 2020, as many as 727,000 missiles and components will require demilitarization. Until now, recycling has appeared to be a win-win solution, for it has enabled significant reductions in open burning/open detonation and other thermal treatment, and it has generated a revenue stream to help pay for the cost of demilitarization and disposal. But in Westford, reportedly, some of that apparently recycled contaminant has leaked free. The Westford reports don't reveal the source of the suspect blasting agent, but the implications are clear. If current practices for handling and using commercial perchlorate-based explosives lead to health-threatening releases, then fuel recycling, in itself, is not an adequate solution. The potential cumulative national impact needs to be investigated. If the Westford story is confirmed and repeated, then either better management practices will be needed to prevent pollution from commercial blasting, or recycling, itself maybe need to be reconsidered. Lenny -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Online Petition and International Day of Action Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] rocket fuel recycling troubles | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Sampling begins at Starmet DU site Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] rocket fuel recycling troubles |