From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 11 Jan 2005 19:39:44 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] More stories on NAS perchlorate report |
Scientists dispute peril of a pollutant BY ALEXANDER LANE Newark Star-Ledger January 11, 2005 A federal panel of scientists yesterday criticized the government's plans to strictly limit a rocket-fuel ingredient turning up in drinking water in New Jersey and elsewhere, saying the chemical was not as dangerous as regulators believed. Environmentalists immediately fired back, charging that White House and Pentagon officials had stacked and scripted the panel at the behest of the defense contractors who would have to clean up the chemical. Yesterday's back-and-forth demonstrated the increasing urgency nationwide about perchlorate, a rocket-fuel ingredient that has been found in as many as three dozen water systems in New Jersey and in water, milk and lettuce in various other parts of the country in the past few years. ... For the entire article, see http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index.ssf?/base/news-19/1105425552135900.xml ************ Perchlorate danger less than feared, panel says By DOUGLAS E. BEEMAN and DAVID DANELSKI Riverside Press-Enterprise (CA) January 11, 2005 An independent panel of scientists has concluded that the rocket-fuel chemical perchlorate is not as hazardous as federal regulators have feared. But the scientists, in a report released Monday, recommended a health limit that is far below the level proposed by the perchlorate industry and its best customer, the Department of Defense. The recommendation by the National Academy of Sciences panel is expected to guide efforts to set health standards for perchlorate in water and food as well as environmental clean-up requirements. Perchlorate has contaminated the Colorado River and several Inland groundwater basins. California science officials and some environmentalists were generally content with the report's conclusions, saying the scientific panel's recommendation is still close to health limits proposed by state and federal scientists. ... For the entire article, see http://www.pe.com/breakingnews/local/stories/PE_News_Local_perch11.f120.html ************* Panel: Perchlorate Less Risky Than Feared National Public Radio Health News Briefs Jon Hamilton January 11, 2005 · Scientific advisers to the government say the chemical perchlorate may be less dangerous than feared. Perchlorate is found in rocket fuel and has been found in drinking water supplies in more than 35 states. About two years ago, the Environmental Protection Agency issued a draft report saying drinking water should contain no more than 1 part per billion of perchlorate. That assessment was controversial, in part because it was based largely on studies of rats. ... For the entire story, see http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4278499 *************** Yuma lettuce growers can breathe easier YUMA SUN STAFF (AZ) AND AP REPORTS January 11, 2005 A panel of scientists concluded Monday that perchlorate, a contaminant found in the Colorado River and in lettuce grown from it, is safe for consumption at levels much greater than the standard being considered by the Environmental Protection Agency. In a report expected to influence a final EPA regulation on the chemical, the National Academy of Sciences recommended allowing a level roughly equal to 20 parts per billion in drinking water. Two years ago, EPA issued a preliminary recommendation of 1 part per billion. "In my opinion the NAS rate seems reasonable, based on clinical studies and further collaborated by ecological and varying epidemiological (natural exposure) studies," said Charles Sanchez, a University of Arizona scientist at the Yuma Agricultural Center, who has been studying perchlorate levels in crops produced here and around the country. Furthermore, he added, the NAS leaves room for modification as studies continue. ... For the entire article, see http://sun.yumasun.com/artman/publish/articles/story_14166.php ***************** Study Disagrees With EPA on Perchlorate Scientists' report says it poses a health risk but not at doses as low as the agency had calculated. By Marla Cone and Lisa Getter Los Angeles Times January 11, 2005 In a long-awaited report, a national panel of scientists wrote Monday that perchlorate, an ingredient of solid rocket fuel that has contaminated drinking water and food throughout the country, poses a public health risk at low doses but not at amounts as low as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency had calculated. The chemical, used primarily by the military, NASA and their contractors, has seeped into hundreds of wells in Southern California and contaminated Colorado River water used for drinking and for irrigating crops in the region. The scientific controversy over what level of the chemical is safe for human consumption pits the Pentagon against environmentalists and drew the attention of top-level White House officials. Environmental groups Monday accused the White House and Pentagon of influencing the panel's findings. The National Research Council panel, led by Richard B. Johnston Jr. of the University of Colorado's School of Medicine in Denver, concluded that perchlorate posed a health threat because it can interfere with the human thyroid gland, which controls how the brain develops in infancy. ... For the entire article, see http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-me-perchlorate11jan11,1,4960378.story?coll=la-health-medicine ****************** Perchlorate in water less of a threat, panel claims Rocket fuel trace level study draws dissent By Tom Pelton Baltimore Sun January 11, 2005 Drinking water tainted by an ingredient in rocket fuel and explosives is less dangerous than previously thought, and the chemical might not cause brain damage in babies or thyroid illnesses at trace levels, according to a report yesterday by the National Academy of Sciences. The report said that perchlorate, which has polluted municipal water supplies in Maryland, California and dozens of other states, might be safe at levels at about 20 times the amount suggested by the Environmental Protection Agency in 2002. The conclusion - if accepted by the EPA and states - could mean a savings of tens of millions of dollars in cleanup costs for defense contractors such as Bethesda-based Lockheed Martin Corp., which has been sued in California for dumping the chemical onto the ground near missile testing sites. An environmental advocacy group, the Natural Resources Defense Council, charged yesterday that the White House and Pentagon had lobbied behind the scenes to convince the scientific panel to downplay the risks of the chemical. ... For the entire article, see http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-te.md.perchlorate11jan11,1,349806.story?coll=bal-local-headlines&ctrack=2&cset=true ************************* Experts duel over perchlorate issue Environmentalists, government spar on standards By Gary Scott Pasadena Star-News January 10, 2005 PASADENA -- An environmental group Monday called on the state Department of Health Services to lower the level of perchlorate allowed in drinking water, even as a national board of scientists concluded the chemical is safe for consumption at three times the state's standard. A 34-page report from the Environmental California Research and Policy Center said perchlorate concentrations of more than one part per billion put children's health at risk. "Kids and rocket fuel don't mix," said Sujatha Jahagirdar, an author of the report. "State officials should act aggressively to protect California's most vulnerable citizens from this contamination.' Meanwhile, the National Academies of Sciences issued a study on Monday that finds perchlorate is safe at a level roughly equal to 20 parts per billion. The competing views are nothing new in the debate over perchlorate, a toxic chemical used in rocket fuel, dynamite and road flares. The contaminant has been found in more than 350 wells in California, including 10 in Pasadena alone. ... For the entire article, see http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/Stories/0,1413,206~22097~2646117,00.html ****************** Pollutant said safer than thought Panel report on perchlorate at odds with EPA findings By SCOTT VANHORNE San Bernardino County Sun (CA) January 10, 2005 A water pollutant also found in some produce and milk is not as dangerous as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency determined in a preliminary risk assessment two years ago, a panel of scientists announced Monday. The National Academy of Sciences concluded that daily perchlorate intake at levels 20 times higher than those posed by the EPA is safe even for sensitive populations, such as fetuses and pregnant women. The Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group, denounced the panel's report and claimed the White House, Pentagon and defense industry strong-armed scientists to downplay the chemical's hazards. Academy officials brushed off the defense council's accusations as unfounded and said the recommendations were based on the best scientific research available, including some funded by perchlorate-linked businesses. ... For the entire article, see http://www.sbsun.com/Stories/0,1413,208~12588~2646089,00.html ******************* Dangers of Rocket Fuel Chemical Downplayed By Rob Stein Washington Post January 11, 2005 A chemical from rocket fuel that has seeped into drinking-water supplies nationwide is safe at higher doses than federal environmental officials had concluded, according to a report released yesterday. The chemical, perchlorate, can be ingested safely at doses more than 20 times those deemed safe by the Environmental Protection Agency, an expert panel convened by the National Academy of Sciences concluded. The conclusion was praised by defense contractors facing potentially billions of dollars in cleanup costs but denounced by environmental activists, who accused the Defense Department, defense industry and White House of exerting undue influence on the panel. The assessment is considered crucial for the EPA, which is establishing the first national standards for the pollutant, and for dozens of states that have been setting their own standards for cleaning up military and industrial sites to try to safeguard drinking water. ... For the entire article, see http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63761-2005Jan10.html ****************** Water safety findings clash A scientific panel's acceptable level of rocket fuel is 20 times what the EPA urges. By Chris Bowman Sacramento Bee (CA) January 11, 2005 Get weekday updates of Sacramento Bee headlines and breaking news. Sign up here. An independent panel of distinguished scientists concluded Monday that a rocket-fuel chemical pervasive in California's drinking water supplies is safe to consume at levels 20 times greater than the dose proposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The National Academy of Sciences committee criticized EPA scientists for relying more on studies of laboratory rats than actual human exposures in evaluating people's health risk from exposure to the chemical, perchlorate. ... For the entire article, see http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/environment/story/12005830p-12876259c.html ******************* Panel lessens toxin's hazard PERCHLORATE LEVELS THAT EXCEED EPA RECOMMENDATION OK IN WATER, EXPERTS SAY By Paul Rogers San Jose Mercury News (CA) January 11, 2005 Perchlorate, a toxic chemical used in rocket fuel and flares that has contaminated groundwater in California and other states, is safe to consume at levels 20 times higher than what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has recommended, an expert panel concluded Monday. The long-awaited report from a panel of 15 doctors, scientists and other experts assembled by the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, D.C., is expected to influence the EPA as it works toward setting a final national cleanup standard. Some environmentalists said the finding places public health at risk and might have been affected by pressure from the White House and defense contractors, a charge the National Academy denied. Perchlorate has been linked to thyroid disorders. In Silicon Valley, however, where a 10-mile-long underground plume of perchlorate from a former road flare factory stretches from Morgan Hill to Gilroy, the report should have no effect on cleanup efforts, according to the Santa Clara Valley Water District. ... For the entire article, see http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/10616364.htm -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] NAS press release on perchlorate report Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] New websites for fort ord | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] NAS press release on perchlorate report Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] New websites for fort ord |