From: | lsiegel@cpeo.org |
Date: | 17 Jan 2005 21:04:43 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] UXO in Afghanistan |
[The following article demonstrates how significant the hazard of unexploded ordnance (UXO) is on the former battlefields of the world. Unfortunately, it is easier for governments to find resources to do battle than to help impacted communities recover from it. Still, technologies and procedures being developed for munitions response within the United States could make it easier, cheaper, and safer to address UXO abroad. - LS] Injuries and deaths caused by unexploded ordnance in Afghanistan: review of surveillance data, 1997-2002 Oleg O Bilukha and Muireann Brennan British Medical Journal January 15, 2005 In 2000-2, Afghanistan had the highest number of casualties due to landmines and unexploded ordnance in the world. Increasing international awareness of the public health threat posed by landmines is the legacy of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines. More attention must be paid to the growing and equally deadly threat posed by unexploded ordnance. Methods and results We reviewed the surveillance database on injuries due to unexploded ordnance and landmines maintained by the United Nations Mine Action Center for Afghanistan. About 70% of records in the database came from the clinic based surveillance system operated by the International Committee of the Red Cross, which, in 2002, included 390 health facilities. Other data were collected through mine clearance teams, education programmes to minimise the risks posed by mines, and programmes to help victims. We excluded duplicate entries by comparing the demographics, time, and location of injury of the victim. We used JMP (release 5.0) from SAS Institute for statistical analyses. Surveillance for landmine and unexploded ordnance injuries in Afghanistan is predominantly clinic based, so those who die before reaching a clinic, whose injuries are too minor to seek medical care, and who do not have access to medical facilities are less likely to be captured by surveillance. The resulting sensitivity of the system is estimated to be less than 50%. ... For the entire article, in either HTML or PDF format, go to http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/bmj;330/7483/127 -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Massachusetts to "rethink perchlorate standard" Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Army perspective on Eagle River settlement | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Massachusetts to "rethink perchlorate standard" Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Army perspective on Eagle River settlement |