From: | "Stella Bourassa" <Stellalogic@cfl.rr.com> |
Date: | 31 Jan 2005 00:19:21 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] RAB Rule proposed |
Is this called an exercise in futility? I can now understand the frustration I encountered but I must also address a 'more positive (is that possible)' side of this truth. As a former RAB member of the Camp Bonneville BRAC, my biggest 'fear' and concern was turning over that 3800 acres to a community unaware of the dangers that lurked under it's pristine facade. I felt a sense of pride working with all those who stopped such an insane 'notion' that it could be turned over quickly. So many of the RAB members worked hard to stop such 'a deal', so in my book, though the RAB's may just be a 'pretty picture', those who worked/work with Camp Bonneville have done a great job and I know there are a few others out there. Stella ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henshel, Diane S." <dhenshel@indiana.edu> To: <lsiegel@cpeo.org>; "Military Environmental Forum" <military@list.cpeo.org> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 12:16 PM Subject: RE: [CPEO-MEF] RAB Rule proposed I love it. They have just formalized the decision not to give the RABs any teeth or power in the process. Well, at least they have now acknowledged in writing what we have been told for so long. "All we have to do is listen to you. We may or may not choose to act upon what you say." Appearance of participation in the process is all. Diane Henshel -----Original Message----- From: military-bounces@list.cpeo.org [mailto:military-bounces@list.cpeo.org] On Behalf Of Lenny Siegel Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 12:05 PM To: Military Environmental Forum Subject: [CPEO-MEF] RAB Rule proposed Today, January 28, 2005, the Defense Department published its proposed rule on Restoration Advisory Boards in the Federal Register, pp. 4061-4074 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 32 CFR Part 202 Restoration Advisory Boards (RABs) AGENCY: Department of Defense, Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment), DoD. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Department of Defense (DoD) requests public comment on these proposed regulations regarding the scope, characteristics, composition, funding, establishment, operation, adjournment, and dissolution of Restoration Advisory Boards (RABs). DoD has proposed these regulations in response to 10 U.S.C. 2705(d)(2)(A), which requires the Secretary of Defense to prescribe regulations regarding RABs. The propose of the RAB is to facilitate public participation in DoD environmental restoration activities and active and closing DoD installations and formerly used defense sites where local communities express interest in such activities. The proposed regulations are based on DoD's current policies for reestablishing and operating RABs, as well as DoD's experience over the past ten years in using RABs. DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be submitted on or before March 29, 2005. The Federal Register notice may be downloaded either as HTML or as a PDF file. http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo .gov/2005/05-1550.htm http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo .gov/2005/pdf/05-1550.pdf -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Livermore Labs (CA) plutonium safety Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Draft Instruction on Operational Range Assessments | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] RAB Rule proposed Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Aerial UXO survey at Fort Ord (CA) |