From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 15 Feb 2005 17:31:19 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Citizens Groups Accuse Pentagon of Freezing CW Disposal Funds |
for immediate release: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 Pentagon Freezes Hundreds of Millions in Chem Weapons Disposal Funds Chemical Weapons Working Group PO Box 467 Berea, KY 40403 www.cwwg.org Citizens Groups Accuse Pentagon of Overstepping Its Authority; Senators Seek Release of Funds In an analysis of funds available to proceed with constructing facilities for disposing of chemical weapons stored in Colorado and Kentucky, the Chemical Weapons Working Group (CWWG) believes it has identified over $400 million in appropriated funds frozen by the Pentagon. According to CWWG Director, Craig Williams, "It is beyond the Pentagon's authority to take funds provided by Congress for specific projects and spend them elsewhere without Congressional approval. Such actions usurp Congressional authority--it is the Congress that authorizes and appropriates funds, not the military." The CWWG is not alone. In a strongly worded letter of February 9th, to the Undersecretary of Defense in charge of this program, Mr. Michael Wynne, Colorado's Senators Wayne Allard (R-CO) and Ken Salazar (D-CO) stated, "In your letter..... you wrote that you are not able to proceed with construction at Pueblo because 'conducting operations at existing destruction facilities must take precedence over on-going work at sites still in the design phase, given the Department's limited financial resources.' (emphasis added). You make this argument despite the fact that in the last two Department of Defense appropriations bills, Congress has provided significant funding resources for the Pueblo project, including the $50 million in research and development funds added to the President's FY 05 budget request by Senator Allard. We understand a significant portion of these appropriated funds have not been spent and could be used to complete early construction activities scheduled for phase I and phase II of the project." In its 2005 budget, the Pentagon cut Colorado's funding by $147 million, which they spent almost entirely on cost overruns at other disposal sites. Senator Allard later got $50 million restored for the Colorado project, those funds are now frozen as well.. The CWWG believes it has identified over $400 million in funds currently being held by the Defense Department specifically appropriated for chemical weapons neutralization projects in Colorado and Kentucky. In a statement released on January 27th, Senator Mitch McConnell said, "The budgets for demilitarization at Blue Grass and Pueblo have been slashed, and the money has been transferred to other accounts in spite of the fact that Blue Grass and Pueblo had succeeded in securing permits from the local environmental agencies in record time. Destruction of stockpiles at Blue Grass and Pueblo deserves full funding from the Department of Defense, and I will work to put the demilitarization of these stockpiles back on schedule." According to Williams, "The Pentagon is trying to conceal the ever increasing cost of the chemical demilitarization program, particularly at their incineration sites, by impounding funds for neutralizing chemical agents in Colorado and Kentucky. It appears they intend to continue transferring these funds to disposal programs at other sites where costs have soared. The result is greater risks to certain communities, increased disposal program costs in the long run, and missed treaty deadlines." --30-- For the original press release, see http://www.cwwg.org/pr_02.15.05frozenfunds.html -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Two "ghost ship" articles Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Tewksbury (MA) perchlorate costs | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Two "ghost ship" articles Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Tewksbury (MA) perchlorate costs |