From: | lsiegel@cpeo.org |
Date: | 13 Sep 2005 05:47:38 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Camp Bonneville neighborhood |
[Please excuse the duplicate posting. - LS] The following statement about the remediation of former Camp Bonneville, Washington, is from the Rosemere Neighborhood Association newsletter. For the original go to http://www.rosemerena.org/release.php?page=campbonneville905 Citizens Object to County's Plan to Transform Camp Bonneville into a Public Park September 10, 2005 On September 8, 2005, members of the general public attended an open house hosted by the Washington State Department of Ecology to review the Draft Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) for Camp Bonneville. This document, created by the Army, reveals the Army's proposal for limited cleanup of the property, which Clark County plans to develop into a regional public park. Attendees included Marc Boldt (Clark County Commissioner), Bronson Potter (Clark County Prosecuting Attorney), Glynn Ryan (Army's Head of Base Realignment and Closure from Atlanta), Tom Mielke (Candidate for Clark County Commissioner), Charlie Stemper (Candidate for Mayor of Vancouver), staff from the Clark County Parks Department and the State Department of Ecology, members of the Camp Bonneville Restoration Advisory Board, representatives from the Cowlitz Tribe, JD White & Associates, Trust for Public Lands, PBS Environmental, bomb experts, and various concerned citizens, among others. The meeting room at Marshall House was crowded with attendees. The Department of Ecology presented the Draft study and then fielded a battery of questions brought forward by concerned citizens, including those who live adjacent to Camp Bonneville. Residents who live in expensive homes on the northern perimeter of the Camp complained that their property values have decreased due to proximity to unexploded ordinance (UXO) including missiles, rockets, grenades, etc. These residents also complain that they were never informed about the potential hazards from the Camp and that a perimeter fence has been missing from the Camp for many years. Residents of the Autumn Hills and Summer Hills neighborhoods (on the northern perimeter of the Camp) have been warned not to dig on their property until it has been checked for the presence of explosives caused by target practice sessions held at the Camp for more than sixty years. The County has not held a public meeting to address these concerns even though Commissioner Boldt previously agreed to conduct such a forum. Many citizens commented that the draft study was unacceptable, and plan to offer written public comment. Barry Rogowski from the Department of Ecology commented that his agency, which must approve any land deal the Army makes for cleanup and transfer of the property, also finds elements of the cleanup plan to be unacceptable. The plan does not indicate remedial action for the location of chemical warfare agents, PCB's, or other known chemical hazards, and also includes plans to leave a vast quantity of explosives within the "Central Impact Area," a 65 acre area at the center of the park where Howitzer missiles were targeted. The Army proposes to merely fence off this area and post warning signs, even though it will be situated in the midst of a public park and wildlife refuge that includes trails for horseback riding, camping, shooting ranges, and an odd mixture of other public uses. Under the proposed clean-up plan, a large portion of Camp Bonneville property will never be assessed for explosives and will never experience clean-up efforts. The explanation given is that the probability of UXO existing in these areas is lower, but no one can say that these areas are completely void of explosives. This decision was based on documents from Army archives, even though various historical documents are known to be erroneous or incomplete. Some citizens commented that the County has declared the current re-use and clean-up plan to be an acceptable risk for the public. The Growth Management Act requires the county to create parks based on the growing population. The County has been clamoring to grab Camp Bonneville for many years, even to the point of agreeing to receive the property under the "dirty transfer" without adequate cleanup. The question remains -- will the state's requirement for public park space trump public health and safety? Or, should the public be outraged and demand their parks to be completely safe and clean? The current re-use plan, including documents created by JD White & Associates from 2003, indicates the position of a wastewater treatment facility within the proposed park area, which was never before mentioned or made subject of public meetings. It seems highly irregular to place a wastewater facility in this complex, another concern for nearby residents. A few weeks ago, a member of the Restoration Advisory Board questioned Vancouver City Council about their interests in Camp Bonneville. Mayor Pollard vehemently denied that the city had any involvement or interest in Camp Bonneville, yet the RI/FS repeatedly identifies the City of Vancouver as a participant in the re-use plan under a section tabbed "Institutional Control Alternatives." An explanation for this discrepancy is greatly needed to ensure that the City of Vancouver (and the taxpayers) will not become financially liable for this "dirty transfer" of contaminated property. Mayor Pollard was previously the commander for the Camp Bonneville facility during his tenure with the army, during which time he oversaw the burial of confiscated fireworks in pits that later contributed to a toxic groundwater plume of ammonium perchlorate. The cleanup of these pits cost more than $5 million, and about 15 feet of contaminated solid was removed from landfill four and trucked to a toxic waste facility in Oregon. It will take several years to determine if the toxic groundwater plume has been contained, or if it will travel toward Lacamas Creek or private groundwater wells that belong to nearby residents. The Trust for Public Lands, a non-profit entity that works on transferred properties all over the country, has been engaged by the County to aid in developing a nature conservancy plan that includes clean-up of the property. The Trust for Public Lands hopes to arrange for an agreed upon re-use and clean-up plan that the Department of Ecology can approve. An agreement would be very lucrative to the Trust for Public Lands, as it will receive a commission based on the overall cost of clean-up. The proposed estimate is currently at $16.8 million, a sum inadequate to fully address the dangers at the camp. However, according to Glynn Ryan, the Army's expert on property transfers, that number could double or even escalate to $100 million. Citizens have voiced concerns that the Trust's interest in the project is founded more on monetary gain rather than adequate clean-up and public safety. However, a representative for the Trust explained that it will only participate in the project if an adequate clean-up is planned, and that the Trust is squarely in support of the Department of Ecology's position that a more comprehensive clean-up effort is required than what is outlined in the RI/FS. If an agreement cannot be reached, the process starts all over and a new re-use plan will have to be created. Concerned citizens clearly stated that a public park should not be planned around explosives, chemical residues, and groundwater contamination because of the risk to public health and safety, and that the County should find alternate uses for the property or refuse it all together. The Department of Ecology stated that the Army will be liable for any injury or death that may occur from explosives on the property. Clark County residents have been known to find, handle and remove UXO-related items from the Camp. The public must be reminded that these types of military explosives have a 35-80 foot "death zone," meaning that anyone within that distance of a device that explodes could be killed. The Public Comment Period will be open until October 15th, 2005. Written comments may be submitted to: Ben Forseon, Project Manager Washington State Department of Ecology Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 (360) 407-7227 bfor461@ecy.wa.gov -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Nuke waste near Hill Air Force Base Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] We don't want to lose readership | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Nuke waste near Hill Air Force Base Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] We don't want to lose readership |